Multi-resonant feedback control of a single degree-of-freedom wave energy converter
US-2018164754-A1 · Jun 14, 2018 · US
US10344736B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10344736-B2 |
| Application number | US-201715837853-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Dec 11, 2017 |
| Priority date | Dec 9, 2016 |
| Publication date | Jul 9, 2019 |
| Grant date | Jul 9, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The invention provides optimal control of a three-degree-of-freedom wave energy converter using a pseudo-spectral control method. The three modes are the heave, pitch and surge. A dynamic model is characterized by a coupling between the pitch and surge modes, while the heave is decoupled. The heave, however, excites the pitch motion through nonlinear parametric excitation in the pitch mode. The invention can use a Fourier series as basis functions to approximate the states and the control. For the parametric excited case, a sequential quadratic programming approach can be implemented to numerically solve for the optimal control. The numerical results show that the harvested energy from three modes is greater than three times the harvested energy from the heave mode alone. Moreover, the harvested energy using a control that accounts for the parametric excitation is significantly higher than the energy harvested when neglecting this nonlinear parametric excitation term.
Opening claim text (preview).
We claim: 1. A multi-resonant multiple degree-of-freedom wave energy converter, comprising: a buoy in a water environment having a wave motion, wherein the waves impacting the buoy exert an excitation force with a plurality of excitation frequencies that causes a buoy motion in heave, surge, and pitch directions relative to a reference, a power take-off that is configured to apply control forces in the heave, surge, and pitch directions to the buoy and harvest mechanical energy of the buoy motion, a predictor that is configured to predict the excitation force of the wave impacting the buoy in a future time horizon, and a controller that causes the power take-off to apply a force to the buoy to put the heave motion in resonance with the predicted wave excitation force in the heave direction and wherein the control forces in the surge and pitch directions are optimized using a pseudo-spectral control method to maximize parametric excitation of the surge-pitch motion by the heave motion. 2. The wave energy converter of claim 1 , wherein the force in the heave direction is computed using a singular-arc control method.
of a turbine-like wom · CPC title
Cross-Sectional Technologies · mapped topic
Waveform generators, i.e. devices for generating periodical functions of time, e.g. direct digital synthesizers (G06F1/025, G06F1/03 take precedence) · CPC title
Applying a non-resonant auxiliary oscillating voltage, e.g. parametric excitation · CPC title
Digital function generators · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.