Methods and systems for radiotherapy treatment planning
US-2018165423-A1 · Jun 14, 2018 · US
US10342994B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10342994-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615377962-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Dec 13, 2016 |
| Priority date | Dec 13, 2016 |
| Publication date | Jul 9, 2019 |
| Grant date | Jul 9, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
One example method for generating a dose estimation model for radiotherapy treatment planning may include obtaining training data that includes multiple treatment plans associated with respective multiple past patients. The method may also include processing the training data to determine, from each of the multiple treatment plans, first data that includes one or more features associated with a particular past patient, second data associated with treatment planning trade-off selected for the particular past patient and third data associated with radiation dose for delivery to the particular past patient. The method may further include generating the dose estimation model by training, based on the first data, second data and third data from the multiple treatment plans, the dose estimation model to estimate a relationship that transforms the first data and second data to the third data.
Opening claim text (preview).
We claim: 1. A method for a computer system to generate a dose estimation model for radiotherapy treatment planning, the method comprising: obtaining training data that includes multiple treatment plans associated with respective multiple past patients; processing the training data to determine, from each of the multiple treatment plans, first data that includes one or more features associated with a particular past patient, second data associated with a treatment planning trade-off between a parameterized first objective and a parameterized second object selected for the particular past patient and third data associated with radiation dose for delivery to the particular past patient; generating the dose estimation model by training, based on the first data, the second data and the third data from the multiple treatment plans, the dose estimation model to estimate a relationship that transforms the first data and the second data to the third data; obtaining first input data associated with patient geometry of a new patient and second input data associated with a particular treatment planning trade-off selected by a clinician for the new patient; and generating a treatment plan for the new patient using the dose estimation model based on the first input data and second input data. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein processing the training data comprises: determining, from each of the multiple treatment plans, the second data that is associated with one of the following treatment planning trade-offs: trade-off between a first objective associated with an organ-at-risk (OAR) and a second objective associated with a target; trade-off between a first objective associated with a first OAR and a second objective associated with a second OAR; trade-off between a first objective associated with a target and a second objective associated with multiple OARs; trade-off between a first objective associated with a first feature that is non-dosimetrical and a second objective associated with one or more second features; and trade-off between a first objective associated with a first group of features and a second objective associated with a second group of features. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein processing the training data comprises: determining, from each of the multiple treatment plans, the second data that includes one or more dosimetrical features associated with the first objective or the second objective. 4. The method of claim 2 , wherein processing the training data to determine the second data comprises: determining, from each of the multiple treatment plans, the second data that includes one or more non-dosimetrical features associated with the first objective or the second objective. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein processing the training data comprises: determining, from each of the multiple treatment plans, the first data that includes one or more of the following features associated with patient geometry: target volume, organ-at-risk (OAR) volume, relative overlap volume and relative out-of-field volume; and determining, from each of the multiple treatment plans, the third data that includes one or more of the following features associated with radiation dose: dose volume histogram (DVH) and dose distribution. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein training the dose estimation model comprises: estimating a first relationship that transforms the first data to the second data; and based on the first relationship, estimating the relationship, being a second relationship, that transforms the first data and the second data to the third data. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein obtaining the second input data comprises: receiving an instruction associated with the particular treatment planning trade-off; and based on the instruction, determining one or more values of the second input data. 8. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium that includes a set of instructions which, in response to execution by a processor of a computer system, cause the processor to perform a method of generating a dose estimation model for radiotherapy treatment planning, the method comprising: obtaining training data that includes multiple treatment plans associated with respective multiple past patients; processing the training data to determine, from each of the multiple treatment plans, first data that includes one or more features associated with a particular past patient, second data associated with a treatment planning trade-off between a parameterized first objective and a parameterized second object selected for the particular past patient and third data associated with radiation dose for delivery to the particular past patient; generating the dose estimation model by training, based on the first data, the second data and the third data from the multiple treatment plans, the dose estimation model to estimate a relationship that transforms the first data and the second data to the third data; obtaining first input data associated with patient geometry of a new patient and second input data associated with a particular treatment planning trade-off selected by a clinician for the new patient; and generating a treatment plan for the new patient using the dose estimation model based on the first input data and second input data. 9. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein processing the training data comprises: determining, from each of the multiple treatment plans, the second data that is associated with one of the following treatment planning trade-offs: trade-off between a first objective associated with an organ-at-risk (OAR) and a second objective associated with a target; trade-off between a first objective associated with a first OAR and a second objective associated with a second OAR; trade-off between a first objective associated with a target and a second objective associated with multiple OARs; trade-off between a first objective associated with a first feature that is non-dosimetrical and a second objective associated with one or more second features; and trade-off between a first objective associated with a first group of features and a second objective associated with a second group of features. 10. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 9 , wherein processing the training data comprises: determining, from each of the multiple treatment plans, the second data that includes one or more dosimetrical features associated with the first objective or the second objective. 11. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 9 , wherein processing the training data to determine the second data comprises: determining, from each of the multiple treatment plans, the second data that includes one or more non-dosimetrical features associated with the first objective or the second objective. 12. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein processing the training data comprises: determining, from each of the multiple treatment plans, the first data that includes one or more of the following features associated with patient geometry: target volume, organ-at-risk (OAR) volume, relative overlap volume and relative out-of-field volume; and determining, from each of the multiple treatment plans, the third data that includes one or more of the following features associated with radiation dose: dose volume histogram (DVH) and dose distribution. 13. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein training the dose estimation model comprises: estimating a first relationship that transforms the first data to the
for handling medical images, e.g. DICOM, HL7 or PACS · CPC title
for processing medical images, e.g. editing · CPC title
relating to mechanical, radiation or invasive therapies, e.g. surgery, laser therapy, dialysis or acupuncture · CPC title
Machine learning · CPC title
for simulation or modelling of medical disorders · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.