System and method for topic extraction and opinion mining
US-9514156-B2 · Dec 6, 2016 · US
US10339184B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10339184-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615357018-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 21, 2016 |
| Priority date | Sep 28, 2009 |
| Publication date | Jul 2, 2019 |
| Grant date | Jul 2, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Techniques for topic extraction and opinion mining are described. For example, a machine accesses a document from a document record of a database. The machine builds a syntax tree of a sentence of the document based on parsing the sentence. The machine assigns a polarity impact to one or more words of the sentence. The machine determines that a plurality of words in the sentence have conflicting polarity based on the syntax tree and the polarity impact of the plurality of words. The machine determines a classification of the sentence based on the determining that the plurality of words in the sentence have conflicting polarity. The machine generates a classification record of the classification in the database.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A system comprising: one or more hardware processors; and a machine-readable medium for storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more hardware processors, cause the one or more hardware processors to perform operations comprising: accessing a document from a document record of a database; building a syntax tree of a sentence of the document based on parsing the sentence; assigning a polarity impact to one or more words of the sentence based on matching one or more lexical patterns and the one or more words of the sentence, a lexical pattern being a token sequence, each token of the token sequence comprising a lemma field, a polarity tag field, and a part-of-speech tag field; determining that a plurality of words in the sentence have conflicting polarity based on the syntax tree and the assigned polarity impact of the plurality of words; determining a classification of the sentence based on the determining that the plurality of words in the sentence have conflicting polarity; and generating a classification record of the classification in the database. 2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the operations further comprise identifying one or more key phrases in the document based on a filtering technique. 3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the operations further comprise identifying the sentence of the document based on the identified one or more key phrases, the sentence including the one or more key phrases. 4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the assigning of the polarity impact to the one or more words of the sentence is further based on a polarity word having a dominant impact on a topic. 5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the assigning of the polarity impact to the one or more words of the sentence is further based on a sum of polarities method. 6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the assigning of the polarity impact to the one or more words of the sentence is further based on a syntactic distance between the one or more words and a topic key phrase in the syntactic tree. 7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the determining of the classification of the sentence includes selecting a polarity classification for the one or more words in the sentence, the selecting resulting in classified one or more words. 8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the determining of the classification of the sentence further includes applying one or more heuristic rules to the classified one or more words and the sentence. 9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the operations further comprise determining an opinion associated with a document that includes the sentence based on the classification of the sentence. 10. A method comprising: accessing a document from a document record of a database; building, using one or more hardware processors, a syntax tree of a sentence of the document based on parsing the sentence; assigning a polarity impact to one or more words of the sentence based on matching one or more lexical patterns and the one or more words of the sentence, a lexical pattern being a token sequence, each token of the token sequence comprising a lemma field, a polarity tag field, and a part-of-speech tag field; determining that a plurality of words in the sentence have conflicting polarity based on the syntax tree and the assigned polarity impact of the plurality of words; determining a classification of the sentence based on the determining that the plurality of words in the sentence have conflicting polarity; and generating a classification record of the classification in the database. 11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising: identifying one or more key phrases in the document based on a filtering technique. 12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising: identifying the sentence of the document based on the identified one or more key phrases, the sentence including the one or more key phrases. 13. The method of claim 10 , wherein the assigning of the polarity impact to the one or more words of the sentence is further based on a polarity word having a dominant impact on a topic. 14. The method of claim 10 , wherein the assigning of the polarity impact to the one or more words of the sentence is further based on a sum of polarities method. 15. The method of claim 10 , wherein the assigning of the polarity impact to the one or more words of the sentence is further based on a syntactic distance between the one or more words and a topic key phrase in the syntactic tree. 16. The method of claim 10 , wherein the determining of the classification of the sentence includes selecting a polarity classification for the one or more words in the sentence, the selecting resulting in classified one or more words. 17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the determining of the classification of the sentence further includes applying one or more heuristic rules to the classified one or more words and the sentence. 18. A non-transitory machine-readable storage medium comprising instructions that, when executed by one or more hardware processors of a machine, cause the one or more hardware processors to perform operations comprising: accessing a document from a document record of a database; building a syntax tree of a sentence of the document based on parsing the sentence; assigning a polarity impact to one or more words of the sentence based on matching one or more lexical patterns and the one or more words of the sentence, a lexical pattern being a token sequence, each token of the token sequence comprising a lemma field, a polarity tag field, and a part-of-speech tag field; determining that a plurality of words in the sentence have conflicting polarity based on the syntax tree and the assigned polarity impact of the plurality of words; determining a classification of the sentence based on the determining that the plurality of words in the sentence have conflicting polarity; and generating a classification record of the classification in the database.
Semantic analysis · CPC title
using natural language analysis · CPC title
Document management systems · CPC title
using extracted text · CPC title
Creation of semantic tools, e.g. ontology or thesauri · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.