Abnormality diagnosis system of air-fuel ratio sensor
US-2016131064-A1 · May 12, 2016 · US
US10330040B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10330040-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615182491-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jun 14, 2016 |
| Priority date | Jun 14, 2016 |
| Publication date | Jun 25, 2019 |
| Grant date | Jun 25, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Methods and systems are provided for learning fuel injector error for cylinder groups during a deceleration fuel shut-off (DFSO), where all cylinders of an engine are deactivated, sequentially firing each cylinder of a cylinder group, each cylinder fueled via consecutive first and second fuel pulses of differing fuel pulse width from an injector. Based on a lambda deviation between the first and second pulses, a fuel error for the injector and an air-fuel ratio imbalance for each cylinder is learned. Alternatively or additionally, a difference in crankshaft acceleration between the first and second pulses relative to the expected deviation may be used to learn torque error, and adjust fuel injector error and air-ratio imbalance for each cylinder.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method, comprising: during a deceleration fuel shut-off (DFSO) event where all cylinders of an engine are deactivated, sequentially firing each cylinder of a cylinder group to combust fuel, the fuel provided to each cylinder via consecutive first and second fuel pulses of differing fuel pulse widths from an injector; and based on a lambda deviation between the first and second fuel pulses, learning a fuel error for the injector and an air-fuel ratio imbalance for each cylinder. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, based on a difference in crankshaft acceleration between the first and second fuel pulses, learning a torque error for each cylinder. 3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising adjusting subsequent engine operation based on one or more of or each of the learned fuel error, the air-fuel ratio imbalance, and the torque error. 4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the adjusting includes adjusting a fuel injector pulse width for the injector based on the learned fuel error and the air-fuel ratio imbalance following termination of the DFSO. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein each cylinder fueled via the consecutive first and second fuel pulses of differing fuel pulse widths includes each cylinder fueled via a first, larger pulse width followed by a second, smaller pulse width, a difference between the first pulse width and the second pulse width adjusted to be higher than a threshold. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the consecutive first and second fuel pulses is injected over a same combustion event. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein a duration elapsed between the consecutive first and second fuel pulses is based on one or more of an engine speed and a response time of an exhaust gas oxygen sensor. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein each cylinder includes a port injector and a direct injector and wherein each cylinder fueled via the consecutive first and second fuel pulses of differing fuel pulse widths from the injector includes each cylinder fueled via consecutive first and second fuel pulses of differing pulse widths from one of the port injector and the direct injector on a first cylinder event, and then each cylinder fueled via the consecutive first and second fuel pulses of differing pulse widths from the other of the port injector and the direct injector on a second, subsequent cylinder event of the cylinder. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the learning based on the difference in lambda deviation between the first and second fuel pulses includes learning a first lambda following the first fuel pulse, learning a second lambda following the second fuel pulse, determining an actual lambda deviation based on a difference between the first lambda and the second lambda, comparing the actual lambda deviation to an expected lambda deviation based on a difference between first and second pulse widths, and determining the difference in lambda deviation based on the actual lambda deviation relative to the expected lambda deviation. 10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the first lambda is based on a first air-fuel ratio deviation for each cylinder from a maximum lean air-fuel ratio during the DFSO following the first fuel pulse, and wherein the second lambda is based on a second air-fuel ratio deviation for each cylinder from the maximum lean air-fuel ratio during the DFSO following the second fuel pulse. 11. The method of claim 1 , wherein one or more of purge and/positive crankcase ventilation are enabled during the DFSO, and wherein the cylinder group is selected based on one or more of a firing order and a cylinder position within the firing order. 12. An engine method, comprising: during a deceleration fuel shut-off (DFSO) condition, with purge enabled, injecting and combusting consecutive first and second fuel pulses of differing pulse widths, the consecutive first and second fuel pulses injected from an injector into a cylinder; learning an error for the injector based on an actual change in lambda between the first and second fuel pulses relative to an expected change in lambda, the change between a minimum reading and a reading immediately adjacent the minimum reading; and adjusting fueling from the injector based on the learned error following termination of the DFSO condition. 13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the consecutive first and second fuel pulses include the first fuel pulse with a first, larger pulse width followed by a second fuel pulse with the second, smaller pulse width, a difference between the first pulse width and the second pulse width adjusted to be higher than a threshold, the first fuel pulse separated from the second fuel pulse by a duration. 14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the actual change in lambda is based on a perturbation in exhaust air-fuel ratio from a maximum lean air-fuel ratio for the DFSO condition, and wherein the expected change in lambda is based on the first pulse width relative to the second pulse width. 15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the injector is a first injector of the cylinder and wherein the injecting is performed on a first cylinder event and wherein the learned error is a first error for the first injector, the cylinder further including a second injector, the method further comprising, during a second cylinder event of the cylinder during the DFSO condition, injecting the consecutive first and second fuel pulses of the first and second pulse widths, respectively, from the second injector into the cylinder, and learning a second error for the second injector based on the actual change in lambda between the first and second fuel pulses relative to the expected change in lambda in the second cylinder. 16. The method of claim 15 , wherein adjusting the fueling includes adjusting a split ratio of fuel delivered to the cylinder from the first injector relative to the second injector based on the first error relative to the second error. 17. A method for an engine, comprising: while operating an engine at a maximum lean air-fuel ratio with all cylinders disabled, selectively enabling an injector of a cylinder; injecting and combusting each of a first, longer fuel pulse and a second, shorter fuel pulse from the injector into the cylinder; learning a first air-fuel ratio deviation from a maximum lean air-fuel ratio following the first fuel pulse and a second air-fuel ratio deviation from the maximum lean air-fuel ratio following the second fuel pulse; and learning an injector error based on an actual difference between the first deviation and the second deviation relative to an expected difference. 18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the first, longer pulse has a first pulse width and the second shorter pulse has a second pulse width, and wherein the expected difference is based on the first pulse width relative to the second pulse width. 19. The method of claim 17 , further comprising: learning a first torque deviation based on a first change in engine speed following the first fuel pulse; learning a second torque deviation based on a second change in engine speed following the second fuel pulse; and learning a cylinder torque imbalance based on an actual difference between the first and second torque deviations relative to an expected difference in torque deviation. 20. The method of claim 19 , further comprising: when operating with all cylinders enabled, adjusting fueling from the injector based on each of the learned injector error and the learned cylinder torque imbalance, the adjustin
Testing fuel-injection apparatus, e.g. testing injection timing {(testing of ignition F02P17/00; measuring fuel consumption G01F9/00); Cleaning of fuel-injection apparatus} · CPC title
Multiple injections · CPC title
the fuel injection being effected by at least two different injectors, e.g. one in the intake manifold and one in the cylinder · CPC title
with special conditions for selecting a mode of combustion, e.g. for starting, for diagnosing · CPC title
for injectors · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.