System for monitoring driver alertness and adapting vehicle settings thereto
US-9925872-B1 · Mar 27, 2018 · US
US10328946B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10328946-B2 |
| Application number | US-201715397545-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jan 3, 2017 |
| Priority date | Jan 3, 2017 |
| Publication date | Jun 25, 2019 |
| Grant date | Jun 25, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
An alerter augmentation system includes one or more processors that determine an alertness of an operator of a vehicle system. The one or more processors also generate operator input requests that are separated in time by a temporal delay. These input requests seek responses or action by the operator in an attempt to keep or make the operator alert. The one or more processors change one or more of the temporal delay between the input requests and/or a type of the input requests that are generated based at least in part on the alertness of the operator that is determined.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A system comprising: one or more processors configured to determine an alertness of an operator of a vehicle system, the one or more processors also configured to generate operator input requests that are separated in time by a temporal delay, the one or more processors configured to change one or more of the temporal delay between the input requests or a type of the input requests that are generated based at least in part on the alertness of the operator that is determined, wherein the one or more processors are configured to automatically switch from automatic control of movement of the vehicle system to manual control of the movement of the vehicle system responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a first designated threshold score, and wherein the one or more processors are configured to automatically switch from manual control of the movement of the vehicle system to reduced operation automatic control of the movement of the vehicle system responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a smaller, second designated threshold score. 2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors determine the alertness of the operator based on one or more differences between a current operator behavior and a historical operator behavior. 3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the temporal delay between the input requests regardless of a moving speed of the vehicle system. 4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the temporal delay between the input requests by increasing the temporal delay between the successive input requests responsive to the alertness of the operator that is determined indicating that the operator is alert. 5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine that the alertness of the operator indicates that the operator is alert responsive to the alertness one or more of exceeding the first designated threshold score or increasing from a previously determined alertness. 6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the temporal delay between the successive input requests by decreasing the temporal delay between the successive input requests responsive to the alertness of the operator indicating that the operator is less alert than a previous time. 7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine that the alertness of the operator indicates that the operator is less alert responsive to the alertness one or more of not exceeding the first designated threshold score or decreasing from a previously determined alertness. 8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the type of the input requests by switching from visually providing the input requests to audibly providing the input requests. 9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the type of the input requests provided by the alerter system by switching from audibly providing the input requests to visually providing the input requests. 10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to automatically apply a brake of the vehicle system responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a third designated threshold score. 11. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the movement of the vehicle system while the vehicle system is moving responsive to the alertness of the operator changing. 12. A method comprising: determining an alertness of an operator of a vehicle system using a monitoring system; changing one or more of a temporal delay between successive input requests provided by an alerter system of the vehicle system or a type of the input requests provided by the alerter system based at least in part on the alertness of the operator that is determined; automatically switching the vehicle system from automatic movement control to manual movement control responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a first designated threshold score, and automatically switching from the manual movement control of the vehicle system to reduced operation of the automatic movement control of the vehicle system responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a smaller, second designated threshold score. 13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the alertness of the operator is determined based on one or more differences between a current operator behavior and a historical operator behavior. 14. The method of claim 12 , wherein changing the temporal delay between the successive input requests occurs regardless of a moving speed of the vehicle system. 15. The method of claim 12 , wherein changing the temporal delay between the successive input requests includes increasing the temporal delay between the successive input requests responsive to the alertness of the operator that is determined indicating that the operator is alert. 16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the alertness of the operator indicates that the operator is alert when the alertness as determined by the monitoring system one or more of exceeds the first designated threshold score or increases from a previously determined alertness. 17. The method of claim 12 , further comprising changing movement of the vehicle system while the vehicle system is moving responsive to the alertness of the operator changing. 18. A system comprising: one or more processors configured to automatically instruct an alerter system to generate requests for operator input at time intervals in order to maintain an alertness of an operator controlling a powered system, the one or more processors also configured to direct the alerter system to one or more of change the time intervals between the requests or change a type of the requests responsive to a change in the alertness of the operator, wherein the one or more processors are configured to automatically switch from automatic control of movement of the powered system to manual control of the movement of the powered system responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a first designated threshold score, and wherein the one or more processors are configured to automatically switch from manual control of the movement of the powered system to reduced operation automatic control of the movement of the powered system responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a smaller, second designated threshold score. 19. The system of claim 18 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to direct the alerter system to increase a time delay between successive requests for operator input responsive to the alertness of the operator increasing and to direct the alerter system to decrease the time delay responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing. 20. The system of claim 18 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the movement of the powered system while the powered system is moving responsive to the alertness of the operator changing.
Inactivity or incapacity of driver · CPC title
Alarm means · CPC title
Means for informing the driver, warning the driver or prompting a driver intervention · CPC title
for vehicle drivers {or machine operators} · CPC title
related to drivers or passengers · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.