Expansion of high performing placement criteria

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-10311472-B1
Application number	US-201715432083-A
Country	US
Kind code	B1
Filing date	Feb 14, 2017
Priority date	Jun 25, 2012
Publication date	Jun 4, 2019
Grant date	Jun 4, 2019

Abstract

Systems and methods of evaluating information in a computer network environment are provided. A data processing system can obtain or receive a content placement criterion, such as a keyword, associated with a content item and can determine a quality metric of the content placement criterion. The data processing system can identify a candidate content placement criterion and expand placement criteria associated with the content item to include the content placement criterion and the candidate content placement criterion based at least in part on an evaluation of the quality metric of the content placement criterion. The data processing system can expand placement criteria based in part on a throttling parameter. The data processing system can identify a correlation between a document and the placement criteria to identify appropriate content items for the document.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1. A computer-implemented method of evaluating information in a computer network environment, comprising:
obtaining, by a computing system, initial distribution criteria used to place content, the initial distribution criteria obtained from a content provider;
determining, by the computing system, a quality metric of the initial distribution criteria;
evaluating, by the computing system, the quality metric to determine that the quality metric exceeds a quality metric threshold;
determining a rate of depletion of a budget for placement of the content;
comparing the rate of depletion of the budget for placement of the content to a budget rate threshold value to determine that the rate of depletion of the budget for placement of the content item is below the budget rate threshold;
identifying, by the computing system, a first candidate distribution criteria and a second candidate distribution criteria;
in response to (1) determining that the quality metric exceeds the quality metric threshold, and (2) determining that the rate of depletion of the budget for placement of the content item is below the budget rate threshold, expanding, by the computing system, a set of distribution criteria used to place the content to include the initial distribution criteria and expansion distribution criteria including at least one of the first candidate distribution criteria and the second candidate distribution criteria.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
determining the first candidate distribution criteria from at least one term drawn from the initial distribution criteria.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the content includes a media element, the method further comprising:
using the first candidate distribution criteria to identify a correlation between the content and a web page; and
providing the media element for display with the web page responsive to the correlation.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the content is from a content group having a plurality of group content distribution criteria including the initial distribution criteria, and wherein the quality metric for the initial distribution criteria is determined based on a click through rate of the initial distribution criteria.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the quality metric is based on historical performance of the initial distribution criteria relative to the content.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the content is part of a content group that includes a plurality of content items and wherein the quality metric is based on historical performance of the initial distribution criteria relative to the plurality of content items in the content group.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the plurality of content items in the content group are included in the content group based on similarity of one or more of product, content, sponsor, or genre.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
obtaining a third candidate distribution criterion associated with the content;
determining, at a time after the step of comparing the rate of depletion of the budget for placement of the content to a budget rate threshold value, that a new rate of depletion for the budget for placement of the content meets or exceeds the budget rate threshold; and
excluding the third candidate distribution criterion from the set of distribution criteria used to place the content in response to determining that the new rate of depletion for the budget for placement of the content meets or exceeds the budget rate threshold.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the first candidate distribution criteria and the second candidate distribution criteria includes identifying the first candidate distribution criteria and the second candidate distribution criteria using at least a portion of the initial distribution criteria.

10. A system for providing information via a computer network, comprising:
a data processing system having a content placement module on one or more processors;
a memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the data processing system to perform the operations of:
obtaining, by the data processing system, initial distribution criteria used to place content, the initial distribution criteria obtained from a content provider;
determining, by the data processing system, a quality metric of the initial distribution criteria;
evaluating, by the data processing system, the quality metric to determine that the quality metric exceeds a quality metric threshold;
determining a rate of depletion of a budget for placement of the content;
comparing the rate of depletion of the budget for placement of the content to a budget rate threshold value to determine that the rate of depletion of the budget for placement of the content item is below the budget rate threshold;
identifying, by the data processing system, a first candidate distribution criteria and a second candidate distribution criteria;
in response to (1) determining that the quality metric exceeds the quality metric threshold, and (2) determining that the rate of depletion of the budget for placement of the content item is below the budget rate threshold, expanding, by the data processing system, a set of distribution criteria used to place the content to include the initial distribution criteria and expansion distribution criteria including at least one of the first candidate distribution criteria and the second candidate distribution criteria.

11. The system of claim 10 , the operations further comprising:
determining the first candidate distribution criteria from at least one term drawn from the initial distribution criteria.

12. The system of claim 10 , wherein the content includes a media element, the operations further comprising:
using the first candidate distribution criteria to identify a correlation between the content and a web page; and
providing the media element for display with the web page responsive to the correlation.

13. The system of claim 10 , wherein the content is from a content group having a plurality of group content distribution criteria including the initial distribution criteria, the operations further comprising:
wherein the quality metric for the initial distribution criteria is determined based on a click through rate of at least one of the group content distribution criteria.

14. The system of claim 10 , wherein the quality metric is based on historical performance of the initial distribution criteria relative to the content.

15. The system of claim 10 , wherein the content is part of a content group that includes a plurality of content items and wherein the quality metric is based on historical performance of the initial distribution criteria relative to the plurality of content items in the content group.

16. The system of claim 10 , wherein the plurality of content items in the content group are included in the content group based on similarity of one or more of product, content, sponsor, or genre.

17. The system of claim 10 , the operations further comprising:
obtaining a third candidate distribution criterion associated with the content;
determining, at a time after the step of comparing the rate of depletion of the budget for placement of the content to a budget rate threshold value, that a new rate of depletion for the budget for placement of the content meets or exceeds the budget rate threshold; and
excluding the third candidate distribution criterion from the set of distribution criteria used to place the content in response to determining

Assignees

• Google Llc

Inventors

• Zhao Gaofeng
• Cui Yingwei
• Tan Hui
• Rabii Bahman
• Chai Wei

Classifications

• G06Q30/0253

  During e-commerce, i.e. online transactions · CPC title

• G06Q30/0256

  User search · CPC title

• G06F16/9535

  Search customisation based on user profiles and personalisation · CPC title

• G06Q30/0242

  Determining effectiveness of advertisements · CPC title

• G06Q30/0277

  Online advertisement · CPC title