Method of Designing Model Predictive Control for Cross Directional Flat Sheet Manufacturing Processes to Guarantee Spatial Robustness and to Prevent Actuator Picketing
US-2018087221-A1 · Mar 29, 2018 · US
US10309059B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10309059-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615273705-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Sep 23, 2016 |
| Priority date | Sep 23, 2016 |
| Publication date | Jun 4, 2019 |
| Grant date | Jun 4, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Automated parameter tuning techniques for cross-directional model predictive control for paper-making under user-specified parametric uncertainties are developed. The CD-MPC design explicitly accounts for parametric model uncertainty while finding a value for the CD profile trajectory generation that minimizes the CD settling time of the measurement 2 sigma spread and does not exceed an overshoot limit for actuator 2 sigma spread. The inventive technique includes: (i) providing uncertainty specifications for the temporal parameters of the process model, (ii) specifying 2 sigma overshoot limits for the CD actuator profile, (iii) using robust stability theory to find a minimum bound for the profile trajectory tuning parameter, (iv) using a frequency domain technique to reduce the search range for the profile trajectory tuning parameter, and (v) performing an intelligent search for the tuning parameter that minimizes measurement 2 sigma settling time without exceeding the actuator 2 sigma overshoot limit.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A system which forms a material in a spatially-distributed multivariable-array cross-directional process wherein the system comprises: at least one set of actuator arrays each distributed adjacent to the material in cross direction (CD), wherein each set of actuator arrays is controllable to vary properties of the material; a scanning sensor for measuring and acquiring properties data about the properties of the material; and a multivariable model predictive controller (MPC) providing CD control of the CD process, wherein the MPC, in response to signals that are indicative of the properties of the material, provides signals to the at least one set of actuator arrays to control properties of the material, wherein the MPC includes an interface to allow a processing device to receive: nominal temporal model parameters and corresponding parametric uncertainty specifications; and a specified worst-case 2 sigma (2σ) overshoot limit for a CD actuator profile; for temporally tuning the MPC, the processing device is configured to: (a) develop a robust temporal stability condition based on the parametric uncertainty specifications; (b) calculate a lower bound for a profile trajectory tuning parameter that assures robust stability, comprising; generating a reference trajectory using a temporal filter comprising a parameter; and calculating a lower bound for the profile trajectory tuning parameter using an automatic tuning algorithm; (c) reduce a possible range of the tuning parameter by using a frequency domain technique; and (d) perform an intelligent search for the tuning parameter that minimizes worst-case measurement 2σ settling time without exceeding the actuator worst-case 2σ overshoot limit. 2. The system of claim 1 wherein the nominal temporal model parameters comprise parameters of a temporal mathematical model of the process. 3. The system of claim 2 wherein the parametric uncertainty comprises trust ranges around the nominal temporal model parameters which characterize possible mismatch between the temporal mathematical model and real process. 4. The system of claim 1 wherein the worst-case 2σ overshoot limit comprises the largest overshoot of all possible 2σ spreads given parametric uncertainty specifications. 5. The system of claim 1 wherein the profile trajectory tuning parameter comprises the parameter in the temporal filter that affects aggressiveness of the reference trajectory. 6. The system of claim 1 wherein worst-case measurement 2σ settling time comprises the longest settling time of all possible 2σ spreads given parametric uncertainty specifications. 7. The system of claim 1 wherein the robust temporal stability condition is characterized by a requirement that on temporal frequency response of closed-loop system which guarantees robust stability under the parametric uncertainty. 8. The system of claim 1 wherein the lower bound of the profile trajectory tuning parameter comprises the smallest value of the tuning parameter that guarantees the robust stability. 9. The system of claim 1 wherein the possible range of the tuning parameter comprises a range of tuning parameters within which an optimal tuning parameter exists. 10. The system of claim 1 wherein the MPC includes the processing device for temporally tuning the MPC with respect to one of the actuator arrays. 11. In a process control system having a multivariable model predictive controller (MPC) providing control to a spatially-distributed multiple-array, sheetmakin, cross-directional (CD) process having at least one manipulated actuator array and at least one controlled measurement array, a method of providing control of the multiple-array process that comprises the steps of: (a) tuning the MPC by the steps of: (i) inputting nominal temporal model parameters and corresponding parametric uncertainty specifications; (ii) specifying a worst-case 2 sigma (2σ) overshoot limit for a CD actuator profile; (iii) developing a robust temporal stability condition based on the parametric uncertainty specifications; (iv) calculating a lower bound for a profile trajectory tuning parameter that assures robust stability, comprising; generating a reference trajectory using a temporal filter comprising a parameter; and calculating a lower bound for the profile trajectory tuning parameter using an automatic tuning algorithm; (v) reducing a possible range of the tuning parameter by using a frequency domain technique; and (vi) performing an intelligent search for the tuning parameter that minimizes worst-case measurement 2σ settling time without exceeding the actuator worst-case 2σ overshoot limit; (b) inputting the tuning parameters into the MPC; and (c) controlling the multiple-array CD process with the MPC. 12. The method of claim 11 wherein the nominal temporal model parameters comprise parameters of a temporal mathematical model of the process. 13. The method of claim 12 wherein the parametric uncertainty comprises trust ranges around the nominal temporal model parameters which characterize possible mismatch between the temporal mathematical model and real process. 14. The method of claim 11 wherein the worst-case 2σ overshoot limit comprises the largest overshoot of all possible 2σ spreads given parametric uncertainty specifications. 15. The method of claim 11 wherein the profile trajectory tuning parameter comprises the parameter in the temporal filter that affects aggressiveness of the reference trajectory. 16. The method of claim 11 wherein worst-case measurement 2σ settling time comprises the longest settling time of all possible 2σ spreads given parametric uncertainty specifications. 17. The method of claim 11 wherein the robust temporal stability condition is characterized by a requirement that on temporal frequency response of closed-loop system which guarantees robust stability under the parametric uncertainty. 18. The method of claim 11 wherein the lower bound of the profile trajectory tuning parameter comprises the smallest value of the tuning parameter that guarantees the robust stability. 19. The method of claim 11 wherein the possible range of the tuning parameter comprises a range of tuning parameters within which an optimal tuning parameter exists. 20. A non-transitory computer readable medium embodying a computer program for automatically tuning a model predictive controller (MPC) employed to control a cross- directional process having a manipulated actuator array comprising a plurality of actuators and at least one controlled measurement array wherein the program comprises readable program code for: (a) inputting nominal temporal model parameters and corresponding parametric uncertainty specifications; (b) specifying a worst-case 2 sigma (2σ) overshoot limit for a CD actuator profile; (c) developing a robust temporal stability condition based on the parametric uncertainty specifications; (d) calculating a lower bound for a profile trajectory tuning parameter that assures robust stability, comprising: generating a reference trajectory using a temporal filter comprising a parameter; and calculating a lower bound for the profile trajectory tuning parameter using an automatic tuning algorithm; (e) reducing a possible range of the tuning parameter by using a frequency domain technique; and (f) performing an intelligent search for the tuning parameter that minimizes worst-case measurement 2σ settling time without exceeding the actuator worst-case 2σ overshoot limit.
Predict locally machining forces from model to control remote machine · CPC title
using a predictor · CPC title
controlling the forming section · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.