Emulation of quantum and quantum-inspired spectrum analysis and superposition with classical transconductor-capacitor circuits
US-2018150761-A1 · May 31, 2018 · US
US10275556B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10275556-B2 |
| Application number | US-201715826100-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 29, 2017 |
| Priority date | Nov 29, 2016 |
| Publication date | Apr 30, 2019 |
| Grant date | Apr 30, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
We disclose transconductor-capacitor classical dynamical systems that emulate quantum dynamical systems and quantum-inspired systems by composing them with 1) a real capacitor, whose value exactly emulates the value of the quantum constant ℏ termed a Planck capacitor; 2) a ‘quantum admittance’ element, which has no classical equivalent, but which can be emulated by approximately 18 transistors of a coupled transconductor system; 3) an emulated ‘quantum transadmittance element’ that can couple emulated quantum admittances to each other; and 4) an emulated ‘quantum transadmittance mixer element’ that can couple quantum admittances to each other under the control of an input. We describe how these parts may be composed together to emulate arbitrary two-state and discrete-state quantum or quantum-inspired systems including stochastics, state preparation, probability computations, state amplification, state attenuation, control, dynamics, and loss compensation.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A circuit comprised of: two classical circuit elements each of which emulates a quantum admittance with their transconductance being proportional to the uncoupled eigenstate energy of the corresponding quantum state; four capacitors of value C HBAR that are connected to the real and imaginary terminals of each of the said circuit elements with the capacitor value C HBAR proportional to the quantum Planck constant; and two other classical circuit elements each of which emulates a quantum transadmittance that causes the probability amplitude of one state of a quantum two-state system to be dynamically changed by the probability amplitude of the other state, wherein said circuit facilitates the emulation of a quantum or quantum-inspired two-state system. 2. The circuit of claim 1 wherein the quantum transadmittance coupling is symmetric. 3. The circuit of claim 1 wherein the quantum transadmittance coupling is asymmetric. 4. The circuit of claim 1 wherein each of the two emulated quantum transadmittances are replaced by emulated quantum transadmittance mixers. 5. The circuit of claim 4 wherein the two quantum transadmittance mixers are configured such that one creates a positive complex exponential dynamic coupling between one state to the other while the other creates a negative complex exponential dynamic coupling between one state to the other. 6. The circuit of claim 4 for emulating quantum dynamics or steady-state behavior corresponding to two-state quantum spin systems in nuclear magnetic resonance, optical control of atomic energy transitions between two energetically different or energetically identical states, or for the emulation of qubit control and dynamics in quantum or quantum-inspired computing. 7. The circuit of claim 4 for emulating the effects of pulse-based quantum control and state preparation that architects Bloch-sphere phase changes of a qubit corresponding to a fixed control input pulse length. 8. The circuit of claim 1 for emulating local quantum interactions in distributed quantum systems including for the emulation of nearest-neighbor coupling as in Schroedinger's equation or the emulation of nearest neighbor coupling in quantum particle motion in solids. 9. The circuit of claim 1 wherein the quantum transadmittance elements or the quantum transadmittance mixer elements are configured to implement current-conserving floating interactions between the two quantum states. 10. The circuit of claim 1 wherein any of the quantum admittance or transadmittance, elements exhibit nonlinear operation. 11. The circuit of claim 1 configured to measure or emulate current-voltage characteristics seen in a quantum Josephson junction. 12. The circuit of claim 1 wherein the quantum transadmittance elements are configured to have additional control inputs such that multi-particle interactions in quantum systems or modulations of the transadmittance current due to one input by another input can be emulated. 13. A classical circuit for computing signal variables that are monotonic functions of either the peak, absolute, or squared-signal amplitude deviation from a reference of either or both of the real or imaginary probability-amplitude voltage variables of an emulated quantum-admittance circuit, both of whose outputs are connected to C HBAR capacitors. 14. The circuit of claim 13 wherein such real and imaginary signal deviations are measured from differential signals in a transistor circuit emulating the quantum admittance. 15. The circuit of claim 14 wherein the squared-signal deviation of either the real or imaginary component of the probability amplitude is generated by a stack of two transistors in series each of which is configured to have a current-scaling ratio, nominally at 4, with respect to transistors whose currents differentially represent the real or imaginary components of a probability amplitude. 16. The circuit of claim 14 wherein each differential signal is multiplied with itself in a differential-mixer transistor circuit to generate squared-signal deviations. 17. Any circuit of claim 13 wherein the computed signal variables are used to estimate a signal monotonically related to the probability of an emulated quantum signal with real and imaginary parts by summing or monotonically combining circuit outputs corresponding to the real and imaginary portions of said circuit. 18. Any circuit of claim 17 wherein the probability is automatically normalized to a value proportional to an adjustable bias current regardless of whether the real and imaginary components of a quantum signal are operating in a small-signal linear regime or large-signal regime. 19. A classical circuit that takes the difference of the outputs of the circuit of claim 15 and generates output signals whose energy is dominantly at twice the frequency of that of either the real or the imaginary signals of the quantum admittance. 20. A classical circuit that uses the output signals from the circuit of claim 19 to alter the bias currents of transconductors in an emulated quantum admittance circuit in a feedback fashion such that one can parametrically amplify or attenuate the probability-amplitude signals connected to the quantum admittance circuit. 21. The circuit of claim 4 wherein, to improve resonant mixing under a finite quality factor, only one of a raising or lowering operator is emulated in the system in a particular direction of coupling between emulated quantum states. 22. The circuit of claim 1 wherein the relationships between damping and noise fluctuations between two quantum states of low and high energy or equivalently oscillation frequency is emulated by introducing one floating forward transadmittance-mixer classical circuit from low-to-high energy and one floating backward transmittance-mixer circuit from high-to-low energy, and wherein the mixer inputs are driven by environmental fluctuation noise inputs configured such that higher environmental forcing noise at high frequencies or equivalently higher energies, leads to a lower probability of occupation of the high-energy state with respect to the low-energy state. 23. The circuit of claim 22 wherein the floating transadmittance mixers are replaced by two equivalent grounded transadmittance mixers, also configured with asymmetric environmental noise to correctly emulate fluctuations and damping. 24. The circuit of claim 22 wherein the environmental noise is created by summing inputs from many frequencies on and near the two-state resonant transition frequency that have a random phase relationship to each other. 25. The circuit of claim 22 wherein the environmental noise is created by a digitally programmable pseudo-random-noise generator. 26. The circuit of claim 22 wherein the environmental noise is created by amplifying naturally occurring thermal or white noise in transistors or in other electronic devices. 27. The emulation of noise and damping in quantum dynamical systems or quantum-inspired dynamical systems that utilize the circuit of claim 4 for such emulation wherein all transadmittance mixers that are used for emulating the system, including those used for having measurement states that correlate with actual quantum states, have in addition to their deterministic current flow, a noisy current flow in parallel with the deterministic current flow, which is generated by adding appropri
Probabilistic graphical models, e.g. probabilistic networks · CPC title
using transconductance amplifiers, e.g. gmC filters · CPC title
Machine learning · CPC title
Emulation; Interpretation; Software simulation, e.g. virtualisation or emulation of application or operating system execution engines · CPC title
using field-effect transistors only · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.