Outcome-based software-defined infrastructure
US-2016285732-A1 · Sep 29, 2016 · US
US10216544B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10216544-B2 |
| Application number | US-201715595977-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 16, 2017 |
| Priority date | Mar 25, 2015 |
| Publication date | Feb 26, 2019 |
| Grant date | Feb 26, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method and system for outcome-based adjustment of a software-defined environment (SDE) that includes establishing a link between a business outcome and a first resource configuration from software defined environment, establishing a monitoring mechanism for continuously measuring a current state of the SDE, using a behavior model of the SDE to anticipate, or forecast, a triggering event, and responsive to the forecast of a triggering event, using the behavior model to determine a second resource configuration to achieve the business outcome. The link includes at least one of a utility of services for the business outcome, a cost of a set of resources consumed by the first resource configuration, and a risk of the set of resources becoming unavailable.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for outcome-based adjustment of a software-defined environment (SDE), the method comprising: dividing a business operation into a set of prioritized tasks including high priority tasks and low priority tasks, each task having a corresponding set of key performance indicators (KPIs); establishing a set of outcome links between the set of prioritized tasks and a first resource configuration for the SDE, the set of outcome links favoring the high priority tasks over the low priority tasks with respect to the first resource configuration; establishing a monitoring mechanism for continuously measuring a current state of the SDE while performing each of the prioritized tasks; predicting a triggering event based on a first outcome of a behavior model of the SDE; responsive to predicting the triggering event, determining to change from the first resource configuration to a second resource configuration for the SDE according to the set of outcome links for performing the business operation based on a second outcome of the behavior model; wherein: the set of outcome links include at least one of a utility of services for the business operation, a cost of a set of resources consumed by the first resource configuration, and a risk of the set of resources becoming unavailable; and at least the using the behavior model steps are performed by computer software running on computer hardware. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: capturing a range of tradeoffs for achieving the business outcome from the SDE; wherein: the range of tradeoffs make up a set of resource configurations. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein a tradeoff within the range of tradeoffs includes one of tiering of data storage, tiering of compute resources, placement of processing resources, scaling of compute resources, scaling of storage resources, scaling of network resources, migrating compute resources, migrating storage resources, and migrating network resources. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second resource configuration is determined, at least in part, by the behavior model indicating an improved performance level of a KPI of a high priority task when compared to the corresponding performance level in the first resource configuration. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein infrastructure is provided as a service in a cloud environment. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the triggering event is one of: (i) request by a service; (ii) request by a workload; (iii) deviation of an observed performance indicator of a business operation; and (iv) a potentially catastrophic event. 7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: assigning a priority value to each KPI of the corresponding set of KPIs. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein each task of the set of prioritized tasks is measured by a different set of KPIs. 9. A computer program product for outcome-based adjustment of a software-defined environment (SDE), the computer program product comprising a computer readable storage medium having stored thereon program instructions programmed to: divide a business operation into a set of prioritized tasks including high priority tasks and low priority tasks, each task having a corresponding set of key performance indicators (KPIs); establish a set of outcome links between the set of prioritized tasks and a first resource configuration for the SDE, the set of outcome links favoring the high priority tasks over the low priority tasks with respect to the first resource configuration; establish a monitoring mechanism for continuously measuring a current state of the SDE while performing each of the prioritized tasks; predict a triggering event based on a first outcome of a behavior model of the SDE; and responsive to predicting the triggering event, determining to change from the first resource configuration to a second resource configuration for the SDE according to the set of outcome links for performing the business operation based on a second outcome of the behavior model; wherein: the set of outcome links include at least one of a utility of services for the business operation, a cost of a set of resources consumed by the first resource configuration, and a risk of the set of resources becoming unavailable. 10. The computer program product of claim 9 , further comprising: program instructions programmed to capture a range of tradeoffs for achieving the business outcome from the SDE; wherein: the range of tradeoffs make up a set of resource configurations. 11. The computer program product of claim 10 , wherein a tradeoff within the range of tradeoffs includes one of tiering of data storage, tiering of compute resources, placement of processing resources, scaling of compute resources, scaling of storage resources, scaling of network resources, migrating compute resources, migrating storage resources, and migrating network resources. 12. The computer program product of claim 10 , wherein the second resource configuration is determined, at least in part, by the behavior model indicating an improved performance level of a KPI of a high priority task when compared to the corresponding performance level in the first resource configuration. 13. The computer program product of claim 10 , wherein infrastructure is provided as a service in a cloud environment. 14. The computer program produce of claim 10 , wherein the triggering event is one of: (i) request by a service; (ii) request by a workload; (iii) deviation of an observed performance indicator of a business operation; and (iv) a potentially catastrophic event. 15. A computer system for outcome-based adjustment of a software-defined environment (SDE), the computer system comprising: a processor(s) set; and a computer readable storage medium; wherein: the processor set is structured, located, connected, and/or programmed to run program instructions stored on the computer readable storage medium; and the program instructions include program instructions programmed to: divide a business operation into a set of prioritized tasks including high priority tasks and low priority tasks, each task having a corresponding set of key performance indicators (KPIs); establish a set of outcome links between the set of prioritized tasks and a first resource configuration for the SDE, the set of outcome links favoring the high priority tasks over the low priority tasks with respect to the first resource configuration; establish a monitoring mechanism for continuously measuring a current state of the SDE while performing each of the prioritized tasks; predict a triggering event based on a first outcome of a behavior model of the SDE; and responsive to predicting the triggering event, determining to change from the first resource configuration to a second resource configuration for the SDE according to the set of outcome links for performing the business operation based on a second outcome of the behavior model; wherein: the set of outcome links include at least one of a utility of services for the business operation, a cost of a set of resources consumed by the first resource configuration, and a risk of the set of resources becoming unavailable. 16. The computer system of claim 15 , further comprising: program instructions programmed to capture a range of tradeoffs for achieving the business outcome from the SDE; wherein: the range of tradeoffs make up a set of resource configurations. 17. The computer system of claim 16 , wherein a tradeoff within the range of tradeoffs includes one of tiering of data stora
using virtualisation of network functions or resources, e.g. SDN or NFV entities · CPC title
for predicting network behaviour · CPC title
using network fault recovery (ring fault isolation or reconfiguration in loop networks without recovery actions by a network management system H04L12/437) · CPC title
Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities · CPC title
Resource planning in a project environment · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.