Entity group behavior profiling

US10212176B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-10212176-B2
Application numberUS-201514743861-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateJun 18, 2015
Priority dateJun 23, 2014
Publication dateFeb 19, 2019
Grant dateFeb 19, 2019

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Entity group behavior profiling. An entity group is created that includes multiple entities, where each entity represents one of a user, a machine, and a service. A behavior profile is created for each one of the entities of the entity group. The behavior of each of one of the entities of the entity group is monitored to detect behavior change. An indicator of compromise is detected based on multiple ones of the entities experiencing substantially a same behavior change.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A method, comprising: creating, by a multi-tier security framework, an entity group that includes a plurality of entities, wherein each one of the plurality of entities represents one of a user, a machine, or a service; creating, by the multi-tier security framework, a behavior profile for each one of the plurality of entities of the entity group, wherein each behavior profile includes one or more features; monitoring behavior of each one of the plurality of entities of the entity group by the multi-tier security framework to detect behavior change; detecting, by a local data engine, an indicator of compromise based on each of the plurality of entities experiencing substantially a same behavior change, the indicator of compromise identifying that a potential threat is directed toward a network including the plurality of entities; responsive to detecting the indicator of compromise based on each of the plurality of entities experiencing substantially the same behavior change, analyzing the substantially same behavior change of each of the plurality of entities to identify a portion of data related to processing of each of the plurality of entities, the processing occurring at a time prior to the detecting of the indicator of compromise; and transmitting the indicator of compromise and the identified portion of data to a central computer for further analysis and modeling. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein creating the entity group is performed responsive to receiving input from a user that specifies the plurality of entities belonging to the entity group. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein creating the entity group is automatically performed and populated with the plurality of entities based on a set of one or more attributes common to those plurality of entities. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein creating the entity group is automatically performed and populated with the plurality of entities based on those plurality of entities previously showing similar behavior. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the created behavior profile for each one of the plurality of entities of the entity group includes a set of one or more features that are used to distinguish behavior between the plurality of entities. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the created behavior profile for each one of the plurality of entities of the entity group includes a set of one or more features that are used to distinguish behavior of the created entity group as compared to behavior of a different entity group. 7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the set of features are extracted or derived from metadata and other items of interest including one or more of: network packets propagating to/from devices, log information, and flow based connection records. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the indicator of compromise includes a distance measure determined for each feature of a first behavior profile, combining the distance measure for each feature into a combined distance, and determining that the combined distance exceeds a predefined compromise threshold, and wherein identifying the amount of data related to occurrences of the substantially same behavior change occurring during a previous time period is the amount of data that occurred after a trigger threshold, the trigger threshold being less than the predefined compromise threshold. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the multi-tier security framework includes (i) at least one network sensor engine configured to collect and store information associated with one or more of the plurality of entities, and (ii) a data analysis engine configured to perform analytics on the information associated with one or more of the plurality of entities. 10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: generating, by the multi-tier security framework, a user behavior risk score for each of the plurality of entities. 11. A non-transitory machine-readable storage medium that provides instructions that, if executed by a processor, will cause said processor to perform operations comprising: creating an entity group that includes a plurality of entities, wherein each one of the plurality of entities represents one of a user, a machine, or a service; creating a behavior profile for each one of the plurality of entities of the entity group; monitoring behavior of each one of the plurality of entities of the entity group to detect behavior change; detecting an indicator of compromise based on each of the plurality of entities experiencing substantially a same behavior change, the indicator of compromise identifying that a potential threat is directed toward a network including the plurality of entities; responsive to detecting the indicator of compromise based on each of the plurality of entities experiencing substantially the same behavior change, analyzing the substantially same behavior change of each of the plurality of entities to identify a portion of data related to processing of each of the plurality of entities, the processing occurring at a time prior to the detecting of the indicator of compromise; and transmitting the indicator of compromise and the identified portion of data to a central computer for further analysis and modeling. 12. The non-transitory machine-readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein creating the entity group is performed responsive to receiving input from a user that specifies the plurality of entities belonging to the entity group. 13. The non-transitory machine-readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein creating the entity group is automatically performed and populated with the plurality of entities based on a set of one or more attributes common to those plurality of entities. 14. The non-transitory machine-readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein creating the entity group is automatically performed and populated with the plurality of entities based on those plurality of entities previously showing similar behavior. 15. The non-transitory machine-readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the created behavior profile for each one of the plurality of entities of the entity group includes a set of one or more features that are used to distinguish behavior between the plurality of entities. 16. The non-transitory machine-readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the created behavior profile for each one of the plurality of entities of the entity group includes a set of one or more features that are used to distinguish behavior of the created entity group as compared to behavior of a different entity group. 17. The non-transitory machine-readable storage medium of claim 16 , wherein the set of features are extracted or derived from metadata and other items of interest including one or more of: network packets propagating to/from devices, log information, and flow based connection records. 18. The non-transitory machine-readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein detecting an indicator of compromise includes determining a distance measure determined for each feature of a first behavior profile, combining the distance measure for each feature into a combined distance, and determining that the combined distance exceeds a predefined compromise threshold, and wherein identifying the amount of data related to occurrences of the substantially same behavior change occurring during a previous time period is the amount of data that occurred after a trigger threshold, the trigger threshold being less than the predefined compromise threshold. 19. An apparatus for collaborati

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Traffic logging, e.g. anomaly detection · CPC title

  • for collecting sensor information · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US10212176B2 cover?
Entity group behavior profiling. An entity group is created that includes multiple entities, where each entity represents one of a user, a machine, and a service. A behavior profile is created for each one of the entities of the entity group. The behavior of each of one of the entities of the entity group is monitored to detect behavior change. An indicator of compromise is detected based on mu…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Niara Inc, Hewlett Packard Entpr Dev Lp
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification H04L63/1425. Mapped technology areas include Electricity.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Feb 19 2019 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 3 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).