Method and apparatus for managing recommendation models
US-9218605-B2 · Dec 22, 2015 · US
US10210461B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10210461-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414222143-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 21, 2014 |
| Priority date | Mar 21, 2014 |
| Publication date | Feb 19, 2019 |
| Grant date | Feb 19, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method for performing assisted knowledge discovery includes receiving a dataset. Each of a plurality of analytical techniques is applied to the received data set to generate a plurality of corresponding analytical results. A composite validation metric is applied to each of the plurality of analytical results. The composite validation metric is a single scoring/ranking function that is created from a plurality of different scoring/ranking functions. The plurality of analytical results is presented to a user arranged in accordance with the results of the applying the composite validation metric to each of the plurality of analytical results. A selection from the user from among the plurality of analytical results is recorded. The user's selection is used to modify the composite validation metric such that the analytical techniques responsible for generating the selected analytical result is scored/ranked more highly.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for performing assisted knowledge discovery, comprising: receiving a dataset; applying each of a plurality of different analytical techniques to the received data set to generate a plurality of corresponding analytical results; receiving a composite validation metric that is a single scoring or ranking function that is created from a plurality of different scoring or ranking functions, each of which is assigned a weighing that determines its relative influence on the composite validation metric; modifying the received composite validation metric by removing therefrom each of the plurality of different scoring or ranking functions that is assigned a weighing that is less than a predetermined value; applying the modified composite valuation metric to each of the plurality of analytical results; displaying the plurality of analytical results to a user arranged in accordance with the results of the applying the modified composite validation metric to each of the plurality of analytical results; recording a selection from the user from among the plurality of analytical results; and using the user's selection to refine the composite validation metric by changing one or more of the assigned weighing of the plurality of different scoring or ranking functions such that the analytical techniques responsible for generating the selected analytical result is scored or ranked more highly. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of analytical techniques is a plurality of different clustering techniques and the plurality of corresponding analytical results is a plurality of different clusterings of the same received dataset. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of analytical techniques includes frequent pattern mining techniques, anomaly detection techniques, or factor analysis techniques. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the composite validation metric includes elements from each of the plurality of different scoring or ranking functions along with a set of parameters that defines a relative weighing of each element within the composite validation metric. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the presenting of the results includes listing the results according to rank order as determined by the composite validation metric. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the presenting of the results includes listing the results alongside a score determined by the composite validation metric. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein using the user's selection to modify the composite validation metric includes employing one or more learning algorithms. 8. The method of claim 1 , additionally comprising: receiving a second data set; applying each of the plurality of analytical techniques to the received second data set to generate a second plurality of corresponding analytical results; applying the refined composite validation metric to each of the second plurality of analytical results; and displaying the second plurality of analytical results to the user arranged in accordance with the results of the applying the refined composite validation metric to each of the second plurality of analytical results. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein displaying the plurality of analytical results to the user includes displaying a subset of highest scoring or ranking results. 10. A method for performing assisted knowledge discovery, comprising: receiving a dataset; applying each of a plurality of different clustering techniques to the received data set to generate a plurality of corresponding clustering results; receiving a composite validation metric that is a single scoring or ranking function that is created by combining a plurality of different scoring or ranking functions, each of which is assigned a weighing that determines its relative influence on the composite validation metric; modifying the received composite validation metric by removing therefrom each of the plurality of different scoring or ranking functions that is assigned a weighing that is less than a predetermined value; applying the modified composite valuation metric to each of the plurality of analytical results to place the results in an order of importance; presenting the plurality of clustering results to a user arranged in the order determined by applying the modified composite validation metric; receiving a selection from the user from among the plurality of clustering results; and using the user's selection to refine the composition of the composite validation metric by changing one or more of the assigned weighing of the plurality of different scoring or ranking functions. 11. The method of claim 10 , wherein using the user's selection to refine the composition of the composite validation metric includes employing one or more learning algorithms to adapt the composite validation metric such that the clustering techniques responsible for generating the selected analytical result is scored or ranked more highly.
Physics · mapped topic
Machine learning · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.