Robotic Microtool Control in an Intelligent Automated In Vitro Fertilization and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Platform
US-2024426856-A1 · Dec 26, 2024 · US
US10204706B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10204706-B2 |
| Application number | US-77147510-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Apr 30, 2010 |
| Priority date | Oct 29, 2009 |
| Publication date | Feb 12, 2019 |
| Grant date | Feb 12, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
In one aspect, a programmer for an implantable medical device comprises a user interface that receives user input corresponding to one or more selected stimulation therapy parameters for delivering stimulation therapy to a patient with the implantable medical device and presents an energy consumption estimate of a power source based on the selected stimulation therapy parameters; and a processor that determines one or more programming options that, if selected, would alter the selected stimulation therapy parameters and reduce the energy consumption estimate. The user interface presents at least one of the programming options to reduce the energy consumption estimate to the user with an indication that user selection of one or more of the presented programming options would alter the selected stimulation therapy parameters to reduce energy consumption of the implantable medical device.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A programmer for an implantable medical device comprising: a user interface that receives user input corresponding to selected stimulation therapy parameters for delivering stimulation therapy to a patient with the implantable medical device; and a processor that: determines an energy consumption estimate of a power source based on the selected stimulation therapy parameters; controls the user interface to present the determined energy consumption estimate of the power source; determines that the energy consumption estimate is above a certain level, determines, in response to the determination that the energy consumption estimate is above the certain level, a respective value of a stimulation therapy parameter of the selected stimulation therapy parameters that causes a greatest amount of energy consumption of the selected stimulation parameters; determines one or more programming options for altering the respective value of the stimulation therapy parameter to reduce the energy consumption estimate of the power source based on the selected stimulation therapy parameters, controls the user interface to present a recommendation of more than one of the one or more determined programming options to reduce the energy consumption estimate to the user with an indication that user selection of one or more of the recommended programming options would alter the respective value of the stimulation therapy parameter to reduce energy consumption of the implantable medical device, and receives user input, via the user interface, selecting one or more of the recommended programming options to reduce the energy consumption estimate presented via the user interface. 2. The programmer of claim 1 , wherein the processor determines the one or more programming options for altering the respective value of the stimulation therapy parameter to reduce the energy consumption estimate in part by evaluating a proportional effect on the energy consumption estimate contributed by each program of a plurality of programs in a program group, and wherein each program of the plurality of programs in the program group defines a respective value for each the stimulation therapy parameters. 3. The programmer of claim 2 , wherein the recommended programming options include an option to alter the respective value of the stimulation therapy parameter for the program of the program group that contributes the greatest proportion of the energy consumption estimate. 4. The programmer of claim 2 , wherein the processor controls the user interface to present a representation of the proportional effect on the energy consumption estimate contributed by each program of the plurality of programs in the program group. 5. The programmer of claim 1 , wherein the certain level represents a predetermined consistent level of energy consumption. 6. The programmer of claim 1 , wherein the energy consumption estimate rises above the certain level when an estimated time until a recharge is required drops below a predetermined period of time. 7. The programmer of claim 1 , wherein the user interface presents at least one of the recommended programming options using a slideable indicator that is moveable via user input to alter a recommended value of the respective value of the stimulation therapy parameter. 8. The programmer of claim 1 , wherein the user interface presents at least one of the recommended programming options using a pop-up. 9. The programmer of claim 1 , wherein the user interface presents the indication that user selection of one or more of the recommended programming options would alter the selected stimulation therapy parameters to reduce energy consumption of the implantable medical device using a color coded selection mechanism. 10. The programmer of claim 1 , wherein the processor is configured to determine one or more modifications to the one or more programming options that reduce the energy consumption estimate while limiting any expected reduction in efficacy. 11. The programmer of claim 1 , wherein the processor estimates a future drain on the power source, based on an association between the selected stimulation therapy parameters and historical usage of actual therapy parameters due to manual patient therapy parameter adjustments, to determine the energy consumption estimate. 12. The programmer of claim 1 , wherein the processor estimates a future drain on the power source using a record of patient postures and therapy parameters associated with the patient postures to determine the energy consumption estimate. 13. The programmer of claim 1 , wherein the one or more recommended programming options are selected from a group consisting of: reducing stimulation current amplitude; reducing stimulation voltage amplitude; reducing stimulation pulse rate; reducing stimulation duty cycle; altering stimulation pulse width; altering a number of activated leads or electrodes; altering an electrode combination; altering electrode polarity; altering a number of active programs in a program group; and altering a program selected for a slot of a program group. 14. The programmer of claim 1 , further comprising a telemetry module that facilitates bi-directional communication between the programmer and the implantable medical device, wherein the programmer receives the energy consumption estimate from the implantable medical device via the telemetry module. 15. A method comprising: receiving, with a user interface of a programmer for an implantable medical device, user input corresponding to selected stimulation therapy parameters for delivering stimulation therapy to a patient with the implantable medical device; determining an energy consumption estimate of a power source based on the selected stimulation therapy parameters; presenting, with the user interface, the energy consumption estimate of the power source based on the selected stimulation therapy parameters; determining, with a processor of the programmer, that the energy consumption estimate is above a certain level; determining, in response to determining that the energy consumption estimate is above the certain level, a respective value of a stimulation therapy parameter of the selected stimulation therapy parameters that causes a greatest amount of energy consumption of the selected stimulation parameters; determining one or more programming options for altering the respective value of the stimulation therapy parameter to reduce the energy consumption estimate of the power source based on the selected stimulation therapy parameters, presenting, with the user interface, a recommendation of more than one of the one or more determined programming options to reduce the energy consumption estimate to the user with an indication that user selection of one or more of the recommended programming options would alter the respective value of the stimulation therapy parameter to reduce energy consumption of the implantable medical device; and receiving user input, with the user interface, selecting one or more of the recommended programming options to reduce the energy consumption estimate presented via the user interface. 16. The method of claim 15 , wherein determining one or more programming options for altering the respective value of the stimulation therapy parameter to reduce the energy consumption estimate of the power source based on the selected stimulation therapy parameters comprises evaluating a proportional effect on the energy consumption estimate contributed by each program of a plurality of programs in a program group,
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.