Maintenance systems and methods for use in analyzing maintenance data
US-2015039177-A1 · Feb 5, 2015 · US
US10193384B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10193384-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615541806-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jan 11, 2016 |
| Priority date | Jan 16, 2015 |
| Publication date | Jan 29, 2019 |
| Grant date | Jan 29, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Systems and methods for automatically selecting actions to take on a utility grid to simultaneously reduce uncertainty while selecting actions that improve one or more effectiveness metrics. Grid action effects are represented as confidence intervals, the overlap of which is used as a weight when selecting actions within a constrained search space of grid actions. The response of the utility grid to the grid actions may be measured and parsed by the temporal and spatial reach of the grid action, then used to update the confidence intervals for that particular selected grid action.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method, comprising: receiving an opportunity to vary a control on a utility grid comprising a plurality of possible grid control actions; receiving effectiveness data for the possible grid control actions comprising confidence intervals around the effects of each possible grid control action; selecting a grid control action, using a processor, based on the overlap in confidence intervals of the effectiveness data; and implementing the selected grid control action on the utility grid, further comprising determining an opportunity to vary a control on a utility grid by referencing current states of the controls on the utility grid and a multidimensional space representing possible grid control actions. 2. A computer-implemented method, comprising: receiving an opportunity to vary a control on a utility grid comprising a plurality of possible grid control actions; receiving effectiveness data for the possible grid control actions comprising confidence intervals around the effects of each possible grid control action; selecting a grid control action, using a processor, based on the overlap in confidence intervals of the effectiveness data; and implementing the selected grid control action on the utility grid, wherein the possible grid control actions are defined by a constrained multidimensional space, the points in the constrained space representing the ordinary operational envelope of the utility grid. 3. A computer-implemented method, comprising: receiving an opportunity to vary a control on a utility grid comprising a plurality of possible grid control actions; receiving effectiveness data for the possible grid control actions comprising confidence intervals around the effects of each possible grid control action; selecting a grid control action, using a processor, based on the overlap in confidence intervals of the effectiveness data; and implementing the selected grid control action on the utility grid, further comprising: collecting data on utility grid parameters; and parsing the collected data based at least in part on a spatial reach of the grid control action and a temporal reach of the grid control action. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , further comprising adding data that is within both the temporal reach of the grid control action and the spatial reach of the grid control action to a database configured to store the effectiveness data. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , wherein the spatial reach of the grid control action and the temporal reach of the grid control action are computed using a model of the utility grid. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , wherein the spatial reach of the grid control action and the temporal reach of the grid control action are selected from within confidence intervals derived from the impact of the grid control action on grid response to a second grid control action taken in temporal or spatial proximity to the grid control action. 7. A computer-implemented method, comprising: receiving an opportunity to vary a control on a utility grid comprising a plurality of possible grid control actions; receiving effectiveness data for the possible grid control actions comprising confidence intervals around the effects of each possible grid control action; selecting a grid control action, using a processor, based on the overlap in confidence intervals of the effectiveness data; and implementing the selected grid control action on the utility grid, wherein the selection of the grid control action is randomized and wherein the randomization is weighted based on the overlap in confidence intervals around the effects. 8. A computer-implemented method, comprising: receiving an opportunity to vary a control on a utility grid comprising a plurality of possible grid control actions; receiving effectiveness data for the possible grid control actions comprising confidence intervals around the effects of each possible grid control action; selecting a grid control action, using a processor, based on the overlap in confidence intervals of the effectiveness data; and implementing the selected grid control action on the utility grid, wherein the selection of the grid control action is a selection of at least one of the following: a response to excavation near gas pipelines; a switch state for a capacitor bank or the position of a load tap hanger; and a time delay before taking a scheduled action. 9. A computer-implemented method, comprising: receiving an opportunity to vary a control on a utility grid comprising a plurality of possible grid control actions; receiving effectiveness data for the possible grid control actions comprising confidence intervals around the effects of each possible grid control action; selecting a grid control action, using a processor, based on the overlap in confidence intervals of the effectiveness data; and implementing the selected grid control action on the utility grid, wherein the effectiveness data comprises a risk of pipeline damage from an excavation. 10. A system for automatically selecting grid control actions, comprising: utility grid controls, a search space memory configured to store a search space of utility grid control states; a knowledge database configured to store effectiveness data comprising confidence intervals around the effects of the utility grid control states; and a control assignment processor configured to select utility grid control states based on the effectiveness data, wherein the grid controls are at least one of the following: dispatching and messaging systems for responding to excavation near pipelines; and capacitor banks and load tap changers.
Simulating, planning, modelling, reliability check or computer assisted design [CAD] of electric power networks · CPC title
characterised by displaying of information or by user interaction, e.g. supervisory control and data acquisition [SCADA] systems · CPC title
Circuit arrangements for AC mains or AC distribution networks · CPC title
Display of information, e.g. of data or controls · CPC title
electric · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.