Construction machine
US-2017292243-A1 · Oct 12, 2017 · US
US10183852B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10183852-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615182875-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jun 15, 2016 |
| Priority date | Jul 30, 2015 |
| Publication date | Jan 22, 2019 |
| Grant date | Jan 22, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A hydraulic control system that uses system pressure information and a rescaled operator input to command valve spool area to control actuator speed. The system uses soft sealing and/or soft pressure compensation.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. An electronic valve actuator system, comprising: a controller connected to an input device and a hydraulic system; the hydraulic system having a valve that controls flow to and from an actuator; wherein, based on pressure information received from the hydraulic system, the controller determines a maximum allowed opening area for the valve and rescales an operator input command from the input device to the maximum allowed opening area to command a velocity of the actuator to achieve good input resolution. 2. The system of claim 1 wherein an input conditioning block is used to rescale the operator input command. 3. The system of claim 1 wherein a predeterminative value is stored in the controller and used to estimate a maximum allowed input command. 4. The system of claim 1 wherein the controller sends a command to the actuator that is the absolute minimum of the rescaled operator input command and the maximum allowed opening area. 5. An electronic valve actuator system, comprising: a controller connected to an input device and a hydraulic system; the hydraulic system having a valve that controls flow to and from an actuator; wherein the controller has software where a desired pressure margin is set and a proportional-integral-derivative controller obtains constant pressure drop across the valve; and wherein a proportional-integral-derivative output is compared to an operator input command by the controller to provide a modified PVE command to the actuator. 6. The system of claim 5 wherein the proportional-integral-derivative controller calculates an error based on the set pressure margin and a calculated system pressure. 7. The system of claim 6 wherein the controller is configured to calculate system pressure based upon hoist pressure detected by a sensor that provides hoist pressure feedback and a previously estimated tank pressure. 8. The system of claim 7 wherein tank pressure is estimated based on average pressure drop across the valve when lowering a hoist with different load situations. 9. The system of claim 5 wherein the modified PVE command is passed on to a PVE driver which commands the actuator. 10. A method of controlling a hydraulic system, comprising the steps of: determining a maximum allowed opening for a valve that controls flow to and from an actuator using a controller to limit speed of the actuator; rescaling an operator input command to the maximum allowed opening of the valve using the controller; and commanding actuator velocity using the controller based upon the rescaled operator input command. 11. The method of claim 10 wherein the maximum allowed opening for the valve is based upon pressure information from a hydraulic system. 12. The method of claim 10 wherein a conditioning block is used to rescale the operator input command. 13. The method of claim 10 wherein a maximum allowed operator command is calculated by the controller from determinative information. 14. The method of claim 10 wherein a maximum allowed operator command is determined from predeterminative information stored in the controller. 15. The method of claim 10 further including the steps of comparing with the controller the rescaled operator command with a maximum allowed operator input command and allowing the absolute minimum to pass through to a proportional valve enable. 16. The method of claim 10 wherein the step of determining the maximum allowed opening for the valve uses a proportional-integral-derivative controller to obtain constant pressure drop across the valve without a need for compensation arrangements. 17. The method of claim 10 further comprising the step of defining a desired pressure margin across the valve. 18. The method of claim 17 further comprising the step of calculating system pressure based on pressure detected by a sensor and previously estimated tank pressure. 19. The method of claim 16 further comprising the step of comparing an output from the proportional-integral-derivative controller with the operator input command to provide a modified proportional valve enable that commands a proportional valve enable actuator.
Hydraulic devices or systems · CPC title
including an electronic controller · CPC title
Closed loop control, i.e. control using feedback · CPC title
Monitoring of fluid pressure systems · CPC title
Control strategy, e.g. with block diagram · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.