Management of dynamic events and moving objects
US-2017180949-A1 · Jun 22, 2017 · US
US10163339B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10163339-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615378036-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Dec 13, 2016 |
| Priority date | Dec 13, 2016 |
| Publication date | Dec 25, 2018 |
| Grant date | Dec 25, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Described herein is a framework to monitor traffic congestion. In accordance with one aspect of the framework, the framework receives vehicle data from vehicle data sources located in a region of interest. The framework may determine a sample size and an average speed for an edge of the region of interest based on the vehicle data. Congestion probability may then be determined based on the sample size and average speed. A report may be presented based on the congestion probability.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A computer system for monitoring traffic congestion, comprising: a non-transitory memory device for storing computer-readable program code; and a processor in communication with the non-transitory memory device, the processor being operative with the computer-readable program code to perform operations including: receiving, by a congestion monitor of the computer system, vehicle data within a time slot from vehicle data sources located in a region of interest, each vehicle data source being located in a vehicle in the region of interest; determining, by the congestion monitor, a sample size and an average speed for an edge of the region of interest based on the vehicle data, wherein the sample size corresponds to a number of vehicles located in the edge of the region of interest within the time slot and the edge of the region of interest is a predefined segment of a road network of the region of interest and wherein an inverse of a variance of the average speed is linearly related to the sample size when the sample size is less than a predetermined value, determining, by the congestion monitor, a congestion probability based on the sample size and the average speed and by: determining the congestion probability comprises determining the variance of the average speed, determining a slope of a graph of the inverse of the variance against the sample size, and modeling a distribution of true speed using a normal probability model, wherein a mean of the normal probability model is the average speed and a variance of the normal probability model is based on the slope, and presenting a report in a graphical user interface based on the congestion probability of the edge of the region of interest. 2. The computer system of claim 1 wherein the vehicle data comprises sequential data records the vehicle data sources, wherein at least one of the sequential data records comprises a device identifier, localization data, speed, time, or a combination thereof. 3. The computer system of claim 1 wherein the vehicle data sources comprise onboard mobile devices capable of continuously streaming the vehicle data. 4. The computer system of claim 1 wherein the report comprises a map of the region of interest indicating different levels of congestion based on the corresponding congestion probabilities of a plurality of edges of the region of interest. 5. The system of claim 1 wherein the determining the slope of the graph further comprises determining the slope based on historical vehicle data. 6. The system of claim 1 wherein the determining the congestion probability comprises determining a cumulative distribution of the normal probability model. 7. The system of claim 6 wherein the determining the cumulative distribution Pr comprises determining Pr ( mi ≤ C ) = 1 2 ⌊ 1 + erf ( Ni 2 C - vi 12.8 ) ⌋ wherein v i is the average speed, N i is the sample size, erf is an error function, m i is a true speed and C is a congestion threshold speed. 8. The system of claim 7 wherein the congestion threshold speed is selected based on a standardized grade level of the edge. 9. The system of claim 1 wherein presenting the report based on the congestion probability comprises displaying a map of the region of interest indicating different levels of congestion based on the corresponding congestion probabilities of a plurality of edges of the region of interest and further comprising updating the map in real-time in response to receiving new vehicle data. 10. A method of monitoring traffic congestion, the method being implemented by at least one computing device and comprising: receiving, by a congestion monitor of the at least one computing device, vehicle data within a time slot from vehicle data sources located in a region of interest; each vehicle data source being located in a vehicle in the region of interest; determining, by the congestion monitor, a sample size and an average speed for an edge of the region of interest based on the vehicle data, wherein the sample size corresponds to a number of vehicles located in the edge of the region of interest within the time slot and the edge of the region of interest is a predefined segment of a road network of the region of interest and wherein an inverse of a variance of the average speed is linearly related to the sample size when the sample size is less than a predetermined value; determining, by the congestion monitor, a congestion probability based on the sample size and the average speed and by: determining the congestion probability comprises determining the variance of the average speed; determining a slope of a graph of the inverse of the variance against the sample size; and modeling a distribution of true speed using a normal probability model, wherein a mean of the normal probability model is the average speed and a variance of the normal probability model is based on the slope; and presenting a report in a graphical user interface based on the congestion probability of the edge of the region of interest. 11. The method of claim 10 wherein the determining the slope of the graph comprises determining the slope based on historical vehicle data. 12. The method of claim 10 wherein the determining the congestion probability comprises determining a cumulative distribution of the normal probability model. 13. The method of claim 12 wherein the determining the cumulative distribution Pr comprises determining Pr ( m i ≤ C ) = 1 2 ⌊ 1 + erf ( N i 2
for classifying traffic situation · CPC title
from the vehicle, e.g. floating car data [FCD] · CPC title
with provision for determining speed or overspeed {(speed measuring in general G01P)} · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.