Dynamic self-calibration of an accelerometer system

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-10126324-B2
Application number	US-201715615438-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Jun 6, 2017
Priority date	Oct 8, 2012
Publication date	Nov 13, 2018
Grant date	Nov 13, 2018

Abstract

One embodiment includes a method for dynamic self-calibration of an accelerometer system. The method includes forcing a proof-mass associated with a sensor of the accelerometer system in a first direction to a first predetermined position and obtaining a first measurement associated with the sensor in the first predetermined position via at least one force/detection element of the sensor. The method also includes forcing the proof-mass to a second predetermined position and obtaining a second measurement associated with the sensor in the second predetermined position via the at least one force/detection element of the sensor. The method further includes calibrating the accelerometer system based on the first and second measurements.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1. A method for dynamic self-calibration of an accelerometer system, the method comprising:
calculating an initial scale-factor of the accelerometer system with respect to a first proof-mass associated with a first sensor of the accelerometer system in a pre-calibration procedure and modeling the initial scale-factor over a predetermined range of temperature, the accelerometer system further comprising a second sensor that comprises a second proof-mass, the pre-calibration procedure comprising displacing the proof-mass and measuring a predetermined calibration acceleration;
calculating an initial dynamic bias associated with the sensor based on a plurality of predetermined accelerations having distinct values and based on the initial scale-factor;
periodically performing a self-calibration procedure to adjust a real-time scale-factor based on the initial scale-factor, the self-calibration procedure comprising:
displacing the first proof-mass to a first predetermined position at a first time;
measuring a force acting upon the first and second sensors at the first time;
displacing the first proof-mass to a second predetermined position at a second time;
measuring a force acting upon the first and second sensors at the second time;
subtracting the measurements of the force acting upon the first and second sensors at the first and second times to generate a difference;
dividing the difference by an initial pre-calibrated difference to generate a divided result; and

multiplying the divided result by the initial scale-factor to calculate the real-time scale-factor of the first sensor; and
periodically calculating a dynamic bias associated with the sensor based on a plurality of distinct accelerations and based on the self-calibrated scale factor.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating the dynamic bias comprises:
applying the plurality of distinct accelerations;
measuring the force acting upon the proof-mass at each of the plurality of distinct accelerations based on the self-calibrated scale-factor; and
solving for the bias based on the measured force at each of the plurality of distinct accelerations.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating the initial scale-factor comprises calculating an initial scale-factor for each of the first and second proof-masses associated with the respective first and second sensors, wherein calculating the dynamic bias comprises calculating the dynamic bias associated with each of the first and second sensors based on the plurality of distinct accelerations and based on the self-calibrated scale-factor for each of the first and second proof-masses, and wherein periodically performing the self-calibration comprises alternately periodically performing a self-calibration procedure for each of the first and second sensors.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein calculating the initial scale-factor and periodically performing the self-calibration procedure comprises calculating a force associated with the first predetermined position of the first proof-mass and the second predetermined position of the second proof-mass.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein displacing each of the first and second proof-masses comprises disabling a subset of position detection force/detection elements associated with at least one of two opposite displacement directions of the respective one of the first and second proof-masses to apply a perturbation of the electrical null position in the at least one of two opposite displacement directions of the respective one of the first and second proof-masses with respect to an initial null position.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein displacing each of the first and second proof-masses comprises displacing an intermediate proof-mass that interconnects the respective one of the first and second proof-masses to a frame associated with the respective one of the first and second sensors while maintaining the respective one of the first and second proof-masses at a null position with respect to a plurality of forcer force/detection elements above and below the respective one of the first and second proof-masses.

7. A method for dynamic self-calibration of an accelerometer system, the method comprising:
calculating an initial scale-factor of the accelerometer system with respect to each of a first proof-mass associated with a first sensor of the accelerometer system and a second proof-mass associated with a second sensor of the accelerometer system in a pre-calibration procedure, wherein the first and second sensors comprise opposite input axes with respect to each other, the pre-calibration procedure comprising displacing the first and second proof-masses and measuring predetermined calibration accelerations;
calculating an initial dynamic bias associated with each of the first and second sensors based on a plurality of predetermined accelerations having distinct values and based on the initial scale-factor;
periodically performing a self-calibration procedure to adjust a real-time scale-factor based on the initial scale-factor, the self-calibration procedure comprising alternately displacing the first proof-mass and measuring a real-time acceleration acting upon the first and second sensors and displacing the second proof-mass and measuring the real-time acceleration acting upon the first and second sensors; and
periodically calculating a dynamic bias associated with the sensor based on a plurality of distinct real-time accelerations and based on the self-calibrated scale factor.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein periodically performing the self-calibration procedure comprises:
displacing the first proof-mass to a first predetermined position at a first time;
measuring the real-time acceleration acting upon the first and second sensors at the first time;
displacing the first proof-mass to a second predetermined position at a second time;
measuring the real-time acceleration acting upon the first and second sensors at the second time;
subtracting the measurements of the real-time accelerations acting upon the first and second sensors at the first and second times to generate a difference;
dividing the difference by an initial pre-calibrated difference to generate a divided result; and
multiplying the divided result by the initial scale-factor to calculate the real-time scale-factor of the first sensor.

Assignees

• Stewart Robert E
• Bulatowicz Michael D
• Northrop Grumman Systems Corp

Inventors

• Stewart Robert E
• Bulatowicz Michael D

Classifications

• G01P2015/0828

  the mass being of the paddle type being suspended at one of its longitudinal ends · CPC title

• G01P15/125

  by capacitive pick-up · CPC title

• G01P21/00 Primary

  Testing or calibrating of apparatus or devices covered by the preceding groups · CPC title

• G01P2015/0831

  the mass being of the paddle type having the pivot axis between the longitudinal ends of the mass, e.g. see-saw configuration · CPC title

• G01P15/131

  with electrostatic counterbalancing means · CPC title