Managing Point-to-Point and Point-to-Multipoint Communication in a Distributed Base Station
US-2024422804-A1 · Dec 19, 2024 · US
US10104641B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10104641-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414766728-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Feb 28, 2014 |
| Priority date | Mar 1, 2013 |
| Publication date | Oct 16, 2018 |
| Grant date | Oct 16, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A technology for a user equipment (UE) in a multiple radio access technology (multi-RAT) heterogeneous network (HetNet) that is operable to receive node-selection pricing information from a plurality of nodes in the multi-RAT HetNet. Effective normalized rate can be determined for the plurality of nodes in the multi-RAT HetNet using the node-selection pricing information. A node can be selected to communicate with in the multi-RAT HetNet to maximize a selected preference based on the effective normalized rate.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A user equipment (UE) is configured to select a node in a multiple radio access technology (multi-RAT) heterogeneous network (HetNet), the UE having computer circuitry configured to: receive node-selection pricing information from a plurality of nodes in the multi-RAT HetNet; determine an effective normalized rate for the plurality of nodes in the multi-RAT HetNet using the node-selection pricing information, wherein the effective normalized rate is represented by: R eff = R ( SNR ) Price , where R eff is the effective normalized rate, R(SNR) is a function of a signal to noise ratio (SNR), and Price represents the node-selection pricing information; and select a node to communicate with in the multi-RAT HetNet to maximize a selected preference based on the effective normalized rate. 2. The computer circuitry of claim 1 , wherein the selected preference is one of an effective data rate, a delay, a power level, a throughput, a quality of service, a power efficiency, a data transmission rate for the UE to communicate with the selected node in the multi-RAT HetNet. 3. The computer circuitry of claim 1 , wherein the selected preference is computed as a function of the node-selection pricing information. 4. The computer circuitry of claim 1 , wherein the selected preference is an effective utility that is represented by: U eff =f(U user , U operator , Network price), where U eff is the effective utility, u user is a utility to a user, u operator is a utility to an operator, and Network Price is the node-selection pricing information. 5. A method for a user equipment (UE) selecting a heterogeneous network (HetNet) node in a multiple radio access technology (multi-RAT) HetNet, the method comprising: receiving node-selection pricing information from a plurality of nodes in the multi-RAT HetNet; determining an effective normalized rate for the plurality of nodes using the node-selection pricing information, wherein the effective normalized rate is represented by: R eff = R ( SNR ) Price , where R eff is the effective normalized rate, R(SNR) is a function of a signal to noise ratio (SNR), and Price represents the node-selection pricing information; and selecting a node in the multi-RAT HetNet using the node-selection pricing information to maximize a selected preference relative to the effective normalized rate. 6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising combining the effective normalized rate with a UE preference, a UE utility, or an operator preference to select the node in the multi-RAT HetNet. 7. The method of claim 5 , further comprising maximizing the selected preference by selecting a highest effective normalized data transmission or data reception rate. 8. The method of claim 5 , further comprising initiating a node association with the selected node in the multi-RAT HetNet. 9. The method of claim 5 , further comprising receiving the node-selection pricing information from a single radio access technology (RAT) in the multi-RAT HetNet. 10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the node-selection pricing information from the single RAT in the multi-RAT HetNet is determined using a node range extension scheme. 11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the effective normalized rate is represented by R(SNR origial )=PowerOffsetdB price/(1-Price), where R(SNR original ) is the effective normalized rate, PowerOffsetdB represents a power offset value in decibels, and Price is the node-selection pricing information. 12. The method of claim 5 , further comprising forming a connection between the UE and one of a plurality of nodes in the multi-RAT HetNet by: determining an optimal node for association by rank ordering the normalized effective rates associated with each node; and forming the connection with the one of the plurality of nodes based on the rank ordering.
Resource management for broadcast services · CPC title
based on requested quality, e.g. QoS · CPC title
based on priority criteria · CPC title
using measured or perceived quality · CPC title
Control channels or signalling for resource management · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.