Method and apparatus for projective volume monitoring
US-9532011-B2 · Dec 27, 2016 · US
US10102641B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10102641-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615204564-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jul 7, 2016 |
| Priority date | Dec 27, 2012 |
| Publication date | Oct 16, 2018 |
| Grant date | Oct 16, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Methods for extracting a shape feature of an object and security inspection methods and apparatuses. Use is made of CT's capability of obtaining a 3D structure. The shape of an object in an inspected luggage is used as a feature of a suspicious object in combination with a material property of the object. For example, a false alarm rate in detection of suspicious explosives may be reduced.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method to extract a shape feature of an object in a computed tomography (CT) system, the method comprising: acquiring slice data of an article under inspection with the CT system; generating, from the slice data, 3-dimensional (3D) volume data of an object in the article; calculating, based on the 3D volume data, a first depth projection image of the object in a first direction perpendicular to a horizontal plane and second, third and fourth depth projection images of the object in respective second, third and fourth directions, wherein the fourth projection direction of the fourth depth projection image is orthogonal to the second and third projection directions of the second and third depth projection images; calculating (i) a metric of probability that the first depth projection image might contain the horizontal plane and/or (ii) a metric of symmetry for each of the second, third and fourth depth projection images; and generating a shape feature parameter for the object at least based on the calculated metric(s). 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising calculating a similarity between each of two of the second, third and fourth depth projection images, wherein the shape feature parameter further includes the calculated similarities. 3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising calculating a duty ratio and aspect ratio for each of the second, third and fourth depth projection images, wherein the shape feature parameter further includes the duty ratio and aspect ratio. 4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising calculating a number of facets of a 3D model for the object based on the 3D volume data, and determining a complexity of the 3D model based on the number of facets and a predefined average number of facets, wherein the shape feature parameter further includes the complexity. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second and third projection directions of the second and third depth projection images are essentially orthogonal to each other, and approximate directions of maximal and minimal projection areas of the object, respectively. 6. An apparatus to extract a shape feature of an object in a computed tomography (CT) system, the apparatus comprising: a storage device configured to store slice data from inspection with the CT system; a processing unit configured to: acquire slice data of an article under inspection with the CT system; generate, from the slice data, 3-dimensional (3D) volume data of an object in the article; calculate, based on the 3D volume data, a first depth projection image of the object in a first direction perpendicular to a horizontal plane and second, third and fourth depth projection images of the object in respective second, third and fourth directions, wherein the fourth projection direction of the fourth depth projection image is orthogonal to the second and third projection directions of the second and third depth projection images; calculate (i) a metric of probability that the first depth projection image might contain the horizontal plane and/or (ii) a metric of symmetry for each of the second, third and fourth depth projection images; and generate a shape feature parameter for the object at least based on the calculated metric(s). 7. The apparatus of claim 6 , wherein the processing unit is configured to calculate a similarity between each of two of the second, third and fourth depth projection images, wherein the shape feature parameter further includes the calculated similarities. 8. The apparatus of claim 6 , wherein the processing unit is configured to calculate a duty ratio and aspect ratio for each of two of the second, third and fourth depth projection images, wherein the shape feature parameter further includes the duty ratio and aspect ratio. 9. The apparatus of claim 6 , wherein the processing unit is configured to calculate a number of facets of a 3D model for the object based on the 3D volume data, and determine a complexity of the 3D model based on the number of facets and a predefined average number of facets, wherein the shape feature parameter further includes the complexity. 10. The apparatus of claim 6 , wherein the second and third projection directions of the second and third depth projection images are essentially orthogonal to each other, and approximate directions of maximal and minimal projection areas of the object, respectively. 11. A method of security inspection of an article in a computed tomography (CT) system, the method comprising: acquiring slice data of an article under inspection with the CT system; generating, from the slice data, 3-dimensional (3D) volume data of an object in the article; calculating, based on the 3D volume data, a first depth projection image of the object in a first direction perpendicular to a horizontal plane and second, third and fourth depth projection images of the object in respective second, third and fourth directions, wherein the fourth projection direction of the fourth depth projection image is orthogonal to the second and third projection directions of the second and third depth projection images; calculating (i) a metric of probability that the first depth projection image might contain the horizontal plane and/or (ii) a metric of symmetry for each of the second, third and fourth depth projection images; generating a shape feature parameter for the object at least based on the calculated metric(s); and determining whether the object is suspicious based on the shape feature parameter and a physical property of material contained in the object. 12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising calculating a similarity between each of two of the second, third and fourth depth projection images, wherein the shape feature parameter further includes the calculated similarities. 13. The method of claim 11 , further comprising calculating a duty ratio and aspect ratio for each of two of the second, third and fourth depth projection images, wherein the shape feature parameter further includes the duty ratio and aspect ratio. 14. The method of claim 11 , further comprising calculating a number of facets of a 3D model for the object based on the 3D volume data, and determining a complexity of the 3D model based on the number of facets and a predefined average number of facets, wherein the shape feature parameter further includes the complexity. 15. The method of claim 11 , wherein the determining whether the object is suspicious based on the shape feature parameter and the physical property of material contained in the object comprises: classifying the object using a classifier based on the shape feature parameter; and classifying the object using a classifier based on the physical property responsive to the object meeting a requirement of the shape feature parameter. 16. The method of claim 11 , wherein the CT system is a dual-energy CT system, the physical property comprises equivalent atomic number and/or equivalent electron density, and the determining whether the object is suspicious based on the shape feature parameter and the physical property of material contained in the object comprises: classifying the object using a classifier based on the shape feature parameter; and classifying the object using a classifier based on the equivalent atomic number and/or equivalent electron density responsive to the object meeting a requirement of the shape feature parameter. 17. The method of claim 11 , wherein the CT system is a mono-energy CT system, the physical property comprises a linear attenuation coefficient, and the determin
from three or more stereo images · CPC title
Industrial image inspection · CPC title
Classification; Matching · CPC title
Feature extraction · CPC title
Image post-processing, e.g. metal artefact correction · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.