Ballistic-resistant structural insulated panels
US-2015168106-A1 · Jun 18, 2015 · US
US10101129B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10101129-B2 |
| Application number | US-201815948273-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Apr 9, 2018 |
| Priority date | Nov 14, 2013 |
| Publication date | Oct 16, 2018 |
| Grant date | Oct 16, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A protective device and method of design to protect against multiple blast and impact events for use in any application in which a delicate target has to be protected. The protective device for mitigating the effects of blast or impact employs a first layer having a first acoustic impedance and a second layer having a second acoustic impedance. The second acoustic impedance is different than the first acoustic impedance. The second layer is proximate to the first layer. The first layer and the second layer are chosen collectively to tune the stress waves from the blast or impact events to one or more specific tuned frequencies. A third layer of a visco-elastic material is employed having a critical damping frequency that matches one or more specific tuned frequencies to dissipate the stress waves of the blast and impact event. The third layer is proximate to the second layer.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for mitigating stress waves resulting from a blast or impact, the method comprising: collectively choosing a first layer having a first acoustic impedance and a second layer having a second acoustic impedance to tune stress waves resulting from the blast or impact to one or more specific tuned frequencies, the second acoustic impedance being different than the first acoustic impedance; choosing a third layer being made of a visco-elastic material having a critical damping frequency that matches at least one of the one or more specific tuned frequencies; positioning the second layer proximate to the first layer; and positioning the third layer proximate to the second layer. 2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the step of collectively choosing the first layer having the first acoustic impedance and the second layer having the second acoustic impedance to tune the stress waves resulting from the blast or impact to the one or more specific tuned frequencies comprises collectively choosing the first layer having the first acoustic impedance and the second layer having the second acoustic impedance to tune the stress waves resulting from the blast or impact to the one or more specific tuned frequencies using geometrical parameters of the first layer and the second layer. 3. The method according to claim 1 wherein the step of collectively choosing the first layer having the first acoustic impedance and the second layer having the second acoustic impedance to tune the stress waves resulting from the blast or impact to the one or more specific tuned frequencies comprises collectively choosing the first layer having the first acoustic impedance and the second layer having the second acoustic impedance to tune the stress waves resulting from the blast or impact to the one or more specific tuned frequencies using material parameters of the first layer and the second layer. 4. The method according to claim 1 wherein the step of collectively choosing the first layer having the first acoustic impedance and the second layer having the second acoustic impedance to tune the stress waves resulting from the blast or impact to the one or more specific tuned frequencies comprises collectively choosing the first layer having the first acoustic impedance and the second layer having the second acoustic impedance to allow passage of the one or more specific tuned frequencies to the third layer, whereby the one or more specific tuned frequencies is dissipated in the third layer. 5. The method according to claim 1 wherein the step of collectively choosing the first layer having the first acoustic impedance and the second layer having the second acoustic impedance to tune the stress waves resulting from the blast or impact to the one or more specific tuned frequencies comprises collectively choosing the first layer having the first acoustic impedance and the second layer having the second acoustic impedance to allow passage of the one or more specific tuned frequencies to the third layer, whereby the one or more specific tuned frequencies is visco-elastically dissipated in the third layer. 6. The method according to claim 1 wherein the step of collectively choosing the first layer having the first acoustic impedance and the second layer having the second acoustic impedance to tune the stress waves resulting from the blast or impact to the one or more specific tuned frequencies comprises collectively choosing the first layer and the second layer to increase a time scale of the stress waves resulting from the blast or impact. 7. The method according to claim 1 wherein the step of choosing the third layer being made of a visco-elastic material having the critical damping frequency that matches at least one of the one or more specific tuned frequencies comprises choosing the third layer such that the visco-elastic material recovers within a time scale of a cyclic loading of the one or more specific tuned frequencies. 8. The method according to claim 1 wherein the step of choosing the third layer being made of a visco-elastic material having the critical damping frequency that matches at least one of the one or more specific tuned frequencies comprises choosing the third layer such that a thickness of the third layer is sufficient that the presence of the stress wave at the one or more specific tuned frequencies substantially decays before passage of the stress wave through the third layer. 9. The method according to claim 1 wherein the step of positioning the second layer proximate to the first layer comprises joining the second layer to the first layer. 10. The method according to claim 1 wherein the step of positioning the third layer proximate to the second layer comprises joining the third layer to the second layer. 11. The method according to claim 1 wherein the step of collectively choosing the first layer having the first acoustic impedance and the second layer having the second acoustic impedance to tune the stress waves resulting from the blast or impact to the one or more specific tuned frequencies comprises choosing the first layer such that it is made of an elastic material. 12. The method according to claim 1 wherein the step of collectively choosing the first layer having the first acoustic impedance and the second layer having the second acoustic impedance to tune the stress waves resulting from the blast or impact to the one or more specific tuned frequencies comprises choosing the second layer such that it is made of an elastic material. 13. The method according to claim 1 wherein the step of collectively choosing the first layer having the first acoustic impedance and the second layer having the second acoustic impedance to tune the stress waves resulting from the blast or impact to the one or more specific tuned frequencies comprises the second acoustic impedance being less than the first acoustic impedance. 14. The method according to claim 1 wherein the step of collectively choosing the first layer having the first acoustic impedance and the second layer having the second acoustic impedance to tune the stress waves resulting from the blast or impact to the one or more specific tuned frequencies comprises collectively choosing the first layer having the first acoustic impedance and the second layer having the second acoustic impedance to tune the stress waves resulting from the blast or impact to the one or more specific tuned frequencies such that a portion of the stress wave is reflected back toward the first layer at an interface along the first layer and the second layer and a portion of the stress wave at the one or more specific tuned frequencies is transmitted through the second layer, the reflected portion of the stress wave being greater than the transmitted portion of the stress wave. 15. The method according to claim 14 wherein the step of choosing the third layer being made of the visco-elastic material having the critical damping frequency comprises choosing the third layer such that the third layer receives and dissipates the transmitted portion of the stress wave, a period of the critical damping frequency of the third layer is substantially equal to a time for the reflected portion of the stress wave to traverse the first layer. 16. A method for mitigating a blast or impact frequency of stress waves resulting from a blast or impact, the method comprising: collectively choosing a) a first layer having a thickness, h 1 , and having a first acoustic impedance, being made of a linear-elastic material having a first modulus, E 1 , and a first density, ρ 1 and b)
of synthetic resin · CPC title
Protection helmets (crash helmets A42B3/00) · CPC title
Detonation-wave absorbing or damping means · CPC title
Protective equipment · CPC title
composed of more than one layer {(outerwear resistant to mechanical aggressions A41D31/24; layered products B32B; shaping reinforced articles B29C67/00)} · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.