Determining temporal relevance of newsfeed stories

US10063513B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-10063513-B2
Application numberUS-201414535308-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateNov 6, 2014
Priority dateNov 6, 2014
Publication dateAug 28, 2018
Grant dateAug 28, 2018

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

A social networking system generates stories based on actions of users in the system and provides a newsfeed to users that contain stories that related to one or more of their friends in the system. Although the story ranking algorithm includes a time decay to penalize older stories, stories may actually become stale at different rates. To measure the staleness of a story, the system computes a ratio of a current engagement rate for the story to an average engagement rate for the story. Based on this ratio, the system may filter out stale stories, includes the ratio as a feature in the scoring model, and/or adjust the decay rate.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method, comprising: receiving one or more candidate stories for presentation in newsfeeds for a plurality of users of a social networking system; identifying a subset of candidate stories from the one or more candidate stories, the identified subset of candidate stories eligible for presentation in a newsfeed for a user of a social networking system; and applying a filter to the subset of candidate stories to select one or more stories for inclusion in the newsfeed, wherein applying the filter comprises, for each candidate story in the subset of candidate stories: determining a measure of expected engagement associated with the candidate story based on a rate at which the plurality of users of the social networking system have interacted with the candidate story since the candidate story was available for presentation in the social networking system, determining a measure of current engagement associated with the candidate story based on the rate at which the plurality of users of the social networking systems have interacted with the candidate story in a current time period, computing a temporal relevance of the candidate story based on a comparison between the measure of expected engagement and the measure of current engagement, the temporal relevance indicating a likelihood that the candidate story is relevant to the user in the current time period, determining a decay factor for the candidate story based on the computed temporal relevance, the decay factor indicating a rate at which the candidate story loses relevance, determining a relevance score for the candidate story based on the determined decay factor, responsive to determining that the relevance score is greater than a threshold value, selecting the candidate story for presentation in the newsfeed. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the measure of current engagement comprises: identifying a plurality of interactions between one or more users of the social networking system and the candidate story; weighting each of the plurality of interactions based on a type of interaction; and combining the weighted plurality of interactions to determine the measure of current engagement. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the measure of expected engagement is for a given unit of time, and the current time period is the unit of time that most recently elapsed. 4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising computing the temporal relevance based on a ratio of the measure of expected engagement and the measure of current engagement. 5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising computing the temporal relevance based on a difference between the measure of expected engagement and the measure of current engagement. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining whether to select the candidate story comprises computing a relevance score for the candidate story based on a combination of the temporal relevance and one or more other features of the candidate story. 7. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium containing computer program code for: receiving one or more candidate stories for presentation in newsfeeds for a plurality of users of a social networking system; identifying a subset of candidate stories the one or more candidate stories, the identified subset of candidate stories eligible for presentation in a newsfeed for a user of a social networking system; and applying a filter to the subset of candidate stories to select one or more stories for inclusion in the newsfeed, wherein applying the filter comprises, for each candidate story in the subset of candidate stories: determining a measure of expected engagement associated with the candidate story based on a rate at which the plurality of users of the social networking system have interacted with the candidate story since the candidate story was available for presentation in the social networking system, determining a measure of current engagement associated with the candidate story based on a rate at which the plurality of users of the social networking systems have interacted with the candidate story in a current time period, computing a temporal relevance of the candidate story based on a comparison between the measure of expected engagement and the measure of current engagement, the temporal relevance indicating a likelihood that the candidate story is relevant to the user in the current time period, determining a decay factor for the candidate story based on the computed temporal relevance, the decay factor indicating a rate at which the candidate story loses relevance, determining a relevance score for the candidate story based on the determined decay factor, and responsive to determining that relevance score is greater than a threshold value, selecting the candidate story for presentation in the newsfeed. 8. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 7 , wherein code for determining the measure of current engagement comprises code for: identifying a plurality of interactions between one or more users of the social networking system and the candidate story; weighting each of the plurality of interactions based on a type of interaction; and combining the weighted plurality of interactions to determine the measure of current engagement. 9. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 7 , wherein the measure of expected engagement is for a given unit of time, and the current time period is the unit of time that most recently elapsed. 10. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 7 , further comprising code for computing the temporal relevance based on a ratio of the measure of expected engagement and the measure of current engagement. 11. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 7 , further comprising code for computing the temporal relevance based on a difference between the measure of expected engagement and the measure of current engagement. 12. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 7 , wherein determining whether to select the candidate story comprises computing a relevance score for the candidate story based on a combination of the temporal relevance and one or more other features of the candidate story. 13. The method of claim 1 , wherein computing a temporal relevance further comprises: determining a length of time elapsed since the candidate story was first made available to the user; determining a level of interaction with the candidate story since the candidate story was first made available to the user; and determining the temporal relevance based on the length of time elapsed since the candidate story was first made available to the user and the level of interaction with the candidate story since the candidate story was first made available to the user. 14. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 7 , wherein code for computing a temporal relevance comprises code for: determining a length of time elapsed since the candidate story was first made available to the user; determining a level of interaction with the candidate story since the candidate story was first made available to the user; and determining the temporal relevance based on the length of time elapsed since the candidate story was first made available to the user and the level of interaction with the candidate story since the candidate story was first made available to the user. 15. A computer system comprising: one or more processors; a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing computer program code for: re

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Business processes related to social networking or social networking services · CPC title

  • Electricity · mapped topic

  • Physics · mapped topic

  • H04L51/32Primary

    Electricity · mapped topic

  • Physics · mapped topic

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US10063513B2 cover?
A social networking system generates stories based on actions of users in the system and provides a newsfeed to users that contain stories that related to one or more of their friends in the system. Although the story ranking algorithm includes a time decay to penalize older stories, stories may actually become stale at different rates. To measure the staleness of a story, the system computes a…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Facebook Inc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification H04L51/32. Mapped technology areas include Electricity.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Aug 28 2018 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).