Systems and methods for interference mitigation in heterogeneous networks
US-9743417-B2 · Aug 22, 2017 · US
US10057042B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10057042-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615065804-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 9, 2016 |
| Priority date | Mar 20, 2015 |
| Publication date | Aug 21, 2018 |
| Grant date | Aug 21, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The present invention includes: defining a transmission signal generated by the AP and a transmitter (TX) configured to transmit a signal to the AP and reception signals generated by the AP and receivers (RXs) configured to receive a signal from the AP, and canceling self-interference in consideration of a channel gain of the self-interference at the AP; defining a channel transmitted from the TX to the AP as uplink, defining a channel transmitted from the AP to the RX as downlink, and deriving a signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) for a signal transmittable on the uplink and the downlink; selecting an RX capable of maximizing a capacity sum of transmit powers of the AP and the TX; and selecting optimum transmit powers of the AP and the TX for maximizing SINRs of transmission on the uplink and the downlink.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for controlling medium access in a full-duplex Wi-Fi network, the method comprising: transmitting a Clear To Send-Uplink (CTS-U) frame to a transmitter (TX) and receiver (RX) candidates upon receiving a Request To Send (RTS) frame from the TX; receiving a Clear To Send-Downlink (CTS-D) frame from a RX that won a contention among the RX candidates; calculating an optimum transit power of an access point (AP) and an optimum transit power of the TX using the CTS-D; transmitting an AP Header (HA) frame including the optimum transit power of the TX at the optimum transit power of the AP; canceling self-interference to receive an uplink data frame from the TX; receiving the uplink data frame transmitted from the TX at the optimum transit power of the TX; and transmitting a downlink data frame to the RX that won a contention. 2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the canceling self-interference to receive an uplink data frame from the TX comprises: canceling self-interference by compensating the channel gain at the AP. 3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the calculating an optimum transit power of an AP and an optimum transit power of the TX using the CTS-D comprises: deriving signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratios (SINRs) of the RX and the AP in consideration of transmit powers of clients; deriving a threshold of the SINRs for transmission from the AP to the RX and from the TX to the AP; and deriving, by the AP, a transmission sum rate of the uplink and the downlink. 4. The method according to claim 3 , wherein the deriving of the SINRs of the RX and the AP comprises: defining power (P r,i→j ) received by a j-th client according to a signal transmitted from an i-th client and self-interference power (P r,SI ) at the AP; and defining transmit power (P t,i ) of the i-th client, wherein the transmit power (P t,i ) is expressed as the following equation: P r,i→j =|G i,j | 2 ·E (| X i | 2 )=| G i,j | 2 ·P t,i , P r,SI =|G i,j | 2 ·E (| X AP | 2 )=| G AP,AP | 2 ·P t,AP , [Equation]. 5. The method according to claim 3 , wherein the transmission sum rate is derived from the following equation: sum =log 2 (1+SINR Uplink )+log 2 (1+SINR Downlink ),(bits/s/Hz) [Equation]. 6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the RX that won a contention is determined based on Received Signal Strength Based (RSSB) contention mechanism among the RX candidates. 7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the optimum transit power of an AP and the optimum transit power of the TX are determined in consideration of power information received from the TX and the RX that won a contention, inter-client interference information, and information on self-interference at the AP. 8. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising: deriving a minimum SINR for transmission on the uplink and the downlink, wherein the minimum SINR is set to be greater than a SINR threshold γ for transmission from the AP to the RX and from the TX to the AP and is expressed as the following equation: SINR Uplink = G TX , AP 2 · P t , TX G AP , AP 2 α · P t , AP + N AP ≥ γ , SINR Downlink = G AP , RX 2 · P t , AP G TX , RX 2 · P t , TX
Two-way operation using the same type of signal, i.e. duplex · CPC title
using signalling between network elements · CPC title
Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received {(correcting synchronisation H04L7/00)} · CPC title
Physical resource allocation for ACK/NACK (for physical mapping arrangements in ARQ protocols H04L1/1861) · CPC title
Quality of the received signal, e.g. BER, SNR, water filling · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.