Measurement processing device, x-ray inspection apparatus, method for manufacturing structure, measurement processing method, x-ray inspection method, measurement processing program, and x-ray inspection program
US-2017176181-A1 · Jun 22, 2017 · US
US10047824B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10047824-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414445590-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jul 29, 2014 |
| Priority date | Jul 29, 2014 |
| Publication date | Aug 14, 2018 |
| Grant date | Aug 14, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A computer program and method for pre-balancing a crankshaft. The method includes receiving data related to a three dimensional scan of the crankshaft; generating a model based on the data; and providing instructions, based on the model, for defining a pre-balancing machining axis.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method for pre-balancing a crankshaft, the method comprising: (a) receiving scanned data related to a three dimensional scan of the crankshaft; (b) generating a scanned model based on the scanned data; (c) defining a placement of a temporary longitudinal axis that intersects the scanned model; (d) identifying which portions of the scanned model would be machined away based on the placement of the temporary longitudinal axis, so as to form a theoretically machined crankshaft, by comparing slices of the scanned model to slices of a machining model; (e) creating a mass distribution model of the theoretically machined crankshaft relative to the temporary longitudinal axis; (f) determining whether the mass distribution model is within a pre-set limit; (g) if the mass distribution model is outside of the pre-set limit, repeating (d)-(f) with different placement choices for the temporary longitudinal axis that intersects the model until the mass distribution model is within the pre-set limit; and (h) machining the crankshaft in response to the occurrence of the determination that the mass distribution model is within the pre-set limit. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing instructions for machining a first blind aperture in a first end of the crankshaft and machining a second blind aperture in a second end of the crankshaft, the first and second blind apertures being in alignment with a final temporary longitudinal axis that defines a pre-balancing machining axis. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the defining comprises defining an initial temporary longitudinal axis that intersects a geometric center of the crankshaft. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the scanned model has a first plurality of values indicating whether the crankshaft has material present at each of a first plurality of specific locations, the machining model has a second plurality of values indicating whether a machining operation would be performed at each of a second plurality of specific locations. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the slices are perpendicular to the temporary longitudinal axis, and each slice is representative of a cross section of the theoretically machined crankshaft. 6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the analyzing comprises finding a center of gravity of each slice of the theoretically machined crankshaft relative to the temporary longitudinal axis. 7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the defining comprises determining where the different choice of the temporary longitudinal axis should be properly placed based on the finding of the center of gravity of each slice of the theoretically machined crankshaft. 8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the slices of the scanned model are perpendicular to the temporary longitudinal axis and are representative of cross sections of the crankshaft, corresponding slices of the machining model are perpendicular to the temporary longitudinal axis and are representative of cross sections of the machining model. 9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the comparing of the scanned model to the machining model comprises aligning axially a three dimensional representation of the crankshaft defined by the scanned model, and a three dimensional representation of the machining operations defined by the machining model. 10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the comparing of the scanned model to the machining model comprises aligning radially a three dimensional representation of the crankshaft defined by the scanned model, and a three dimensional representation of the machining operations defined by the machining model.
by removing material from the body to be tested, e.g. from the tread of tyres · CPC title
Static balancing; Determining position of centre of gravity (by determining imbalance G01M1/14) · CPC title
Shape of crankshafts or eccentric-shafts having regard to balancing · CPC title
the rotating body being a shaft (F16F15/34, F16F15/36 take precedence) · CPC title
Determining the moment of inertia · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.