System of configuring active lighting to indicate directionality of an autonomous vehicle
US-2017120803-A1 · May 4, 2017 · US
US10042362B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10042362-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615355658-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 18, 2016 |
| Priority date | Nov 18, 2016 |
| Publication date | Aug 7, 2018 |
| Grant date | Aug 7, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A route for a trip to a destination is generated using map information. A set of no-go roadway segments, where the vehicle is not able to drive in an autonomous mode, relevant to the route from the plurality of no-go roadway segments is identified from the map information. A local region around a current location of the vehicle is determined. A local map region including roadway segments of the map information that correspond to locations within the local region is determined. The set of the plurality of no-go roadway segments is filtered from the roadway segments of the local map region. A cost value is assigned to each roadway segment of the filtered roadway segments of the local map region. Any assigned cost values are used to determining a plan for maneuvering the vehicle for a predetermined period into the future. The vehicle is maneuvered according to the plan.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method for maneuvering a vehicle, the method comprising: generating, by one or more processors, a route for a trip from a first location to a destination using map information, the map information including roadway segments defining the shape and location of roadways, the map information also identifying at least one no-go roadway segment defining roadway segments where the vehicle is not able to drive in an autonomous mode; identifying, by the one or more processors, from the map information, a set of no-go roadway segments relevant to the route from the plurality of no-go roadway segments; determining, by the one or more processors, a local region around a current location of the vehicle, the local region corresponding to a geographic area including both locations that the vehicle is able to reach from the current location within a pre-determined period of time as well as a region behind the vehicle at the current location; identifying, by the one or more processors, a local map region by performing a graph cut on the map information, the local map region including roadway segments of the map information; filtering, by the one or more processors, the set of the plurality of no-go roadway segments from the roadway segments of the local map region; assigning, by the one or more processors, a cost value to each roadway segment of the filtered roadway segments of the local map region; using, by the one or more processors, any assigned cost values to determining a plan for maneuvering the vehicle for a predetermined period of time into the future; and maneuvering, by the one or more processors, the vehicle according to the plan. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising identifying at least one additional no-go roadway segment which would not allow the vehicle to reach the destination using a graph walk starting from the destination, and the set of no-go roadway segments includes the at least one no-go roadway segment as well as at least one additional roadway segment. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the local region is determined periodically and the set of no-go roadway segments are identified only once for the trip. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein a cost value is assigned to a roadway segment of the filtered roadway segments of the local map region based on a construction area corresponding to the roadway segment. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein a cost value is assigned to a roadway segment of the filtered roadway segments of the local map region based on an unprotected left turn corresponding to the roadway segment. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein a cost value is assigned to a roadway segment of the filtered roadway segments of the local map region based on a time to reach the destination from the roadway segment. 7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: storing at least one assigned cost value in a local cache; determining a second local region at least partially overlapping with the local region; identify a second local map region including roadway segments of the map information that correspond to locations within the second local region; filter the set of the plurality of no-go roadway segments from the roadway segments of the second local map region; assigning a cost value to each roadway segment of the filtered roadway segments of the second local map region by retrieving the at least one assigned cost value from the local cache; using any assigned cost values for each roadway segment of the filtered roadway segments of the second local map region to determining a second plan for maneuvering the vehicle for a second predetermined period into the future; and maneuvering the vehicle according to the second plan. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plan includes a set of connected roadway segments of the filtered roadway segments of the local map region that lead out of the local region and have a lowest accumulation of cost values. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the plan includes determining whether a lane change for the vehicle should be forced. 10. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the plan includes determining whether a turn should be executed to move the vehicle between two lane roadway segments. 11. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the plan includes identifying a secondary path when a primary path corresponding to the roadway segments of the route is not available. 12. The method of claim 1 , further comprising identifying a second set of no-go roadway segments using a graph walk on the map information starting from the destination and moving towards the staring location; and wherein filtering the set of no-go roadway segments includes removing any segments of the second set of no-go roadway segments. 13. The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the second set of no-go roadway segments includes identifying segments of the map information that will not get the vehicle to the destination. 14. A system for maneuvering a vehicle, the system comprising one or more processors configured to: generate a route for a trip from a first location to a destination using map information, the map information including roadway segments defining the shape and location of roadways, the map information also identifying a plurality of no-go roadway segments defining roadway segments where the vehicle is not able to drive in an autonomous mode; identify a set of no-go roadway segments relevant to the route from the plurality of no-go roadway segments; determine a local region around a current location of the vehicle, the local region corresponding to a geographic area including both locations that the vehicle is able to reach from the current location within a pre-determined period of time as well as a region behind the vehicle at the current location; identify a local map region by performing a graph cut on the map information, the local map region including roadway segments of the map information; filter the set of the plurality of no-go roadway segments from the roadway segments of the local map region; assign a cost value to each roadway segment of the filtered roadway segments of the local map region; use any assigned cost values to determining a plan for maneuvering the vehicle for a predetermined period into the future; and maneuver the vehicle according to the plan. 15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to identify at least one additional no-go roadway segment which would not allow the vehicle to reach the destination using a graph walk starting from the, and the set of no-go roadway segments includes the at least one no-go roadway segment as well as the at least one additional roadway segment. 16. The method of claim 14 , wherein the local region is determined periodically and the set of no-go roadway segments are identified only once for the trip. 17. The method of claim 14 , wherein a cost value is assigned to a roadway segment of the filtered roadway segments of the local map region based on a construction area corresponding to the roadway segment. 18. The method of claim 14 , wherein a cost value is assigned to a roadway segment of the filtered roadway segments of the local map region based on an unprotected left turn corresponding to the roadway segment. 19. The method of claim 14 , wherein a cost value is assigned to a roadway segment of the filtered roadway segments of the local map region based on a time to reach the destination from the roadway segment.
Display of a road map (G01C21/3614 takes precedence; guidance using 3D or perspective road maps G01C21/3635) · CPC title
Preferred or disfavoured areas, e.g. dangerous zones, toll or emission zones, intersections, manoeuvre types or segments such as motorways, toll roads or ferries · CPC title
Instruments for performing navigational calculations (G01C21/24, G01C21/26 take precedence) · CPC title
where different aspects are considered when computing the route · CPC title
specially adapted for specific applications · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.