Generating digital models of crop yield based on crop planting dates and relative maturity values
US-2017196171-A1 · Jul 13, 2017 · US
US10028451B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10028451-B2 |
| Application number | US-201715427477-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Feb 8, 2017 |
| Priority date | Nov 16, 2016 |
| Publication date | Jul 24, 2018 |
| Grant date | Jul 24, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
In an embodiment, computer processes are programmed to determine planting plans based on planting characteristics data received for an agricultural field and a plurality of management zone delineation options defined for the agricultural field. Each of the planting plans specifies different planting recommendations for the agricultural field. A first graphical representation of the planting plans, and an interactive object is generated and displayed on a computing device. The interactive object is configured to receive input specifying a relative importance ratio between the planting plans for determining a new planting plan for the agricultural field. A particular relative importance ratio is received via the interactive object, and is used to determine the new planting plan, which specifies new planting recommendations for the agricultural field. Information about the new planting plan is displayed on the computer device.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method comprising: using instructions programmed in a computer system comprising one or more processors and computer memory: determining two planting plans based on, at least in part, planting characteristics data received for an agricultural field and a plurality of management zone delineation options defined for the agricultural field; wherein each of the two planting plans specifies different planting recommendations for the agricultural field; using presentation instructions, generating and causing displaying, on a computing device, a first graphical representation of the two planting plans, and generating and causing displaying on the computing device an interactive object that is programmed to receive first input specifying a relative importance ratio between the two planting plans for determining a new planting plan for the agricultural field; using the instructions, receiving, via the interactive object, second input specifying a particular relative importance ratio between the two planting plans for determining the new planting plan for the agricultural field; using the instructions programmed in the computer system, determining the new planting plan based on the particular relative importance ratio and the two planting plans; wherein the new planting plan specifies new planting recommendations for the agricultural field; using the presentation instructions, generating and causing displaying, on the computer device, a second graphical representation of the new planting plan. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: using the instructions programmed in the computer system, determining a first weight and a second weight based on the particular relative importance ratio; wherein the first weight specifies a first contribution of a first planting plan of the two planting plans to the new planting plan; wherein the second weight specifies a second contribution of a second planting plan of the two planting plans to the new planting plan; using the instructions programmed in the computer system, computing new values for the new planting recommendations by averaging first values of the planting recommendations of the first planting plan and second values of the planting recommendations of the second planting plan according to the first weight and the second weight, respectively; using the instructions programmed in the computer system, associating the new values of the new planting recommendations with the new planting plan. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the interactive object is implemented as an interactive graphical slider; wherein the interactive object is programmed to be repositioned along a path displayed on the computer device; wherein the path has two ends; wherein one end of the two ends corresponds to the first planting plan, and another end of the two ends corresponds to the second planting plan. 4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising: using the presentation instructions, generating and causing displaying, on the computing device, a request object that is configured to receive a request to generate the new planting plan for the agricultural field; using the instructions programmed in the computer system, determining whether a request to generate the new planting plan for the agricultural field has been received via the request object; using the instructions programmed in the computer system, generating the new planting plan for the agricultural field in response to determining that the request to generate the new planting plan has been received via the request object. 5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising: using the presentation instructions, generating and causing displaying, on the computer device, one or more additional interactive objects; using the instructions programmed in the computer system, receiving, via the one or more additional interactive objects, one or more modified data values for the new planting recommendations; using the instructions programmed in the computer system, determining an additional planting plan based on at least in part the one or more modified data values and the new planting plan; using the presentation instructions, generating and causing displaying, on the computer device, a third graphical representation of the additional planting plan. 6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising: using the presentation instructions, generating and causing displaying, on the computer device, help information that includes instructions for generating the new planting plan and instructions for using interactive graphical objects. 7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising: using the instructions programmed in the computer system, receiving yield data representing yields of crops that have been harvested from the agricultural field, and field characteristics data representing one or more characteristics of the agricultural field; using the instructions programmed in the computer system, determining the plurality of management zone delineation options for the agricultural field based on at least in part the yield data and the field characteristics data; using the instructions programmed in the computer system, receiving the planting characteristics data representing initial planting preferences for the agricultural field; using the instructions programmed in the computer system, determining the two planting plans based on, at least in part, the planting characteristics data and the plurality of management zone delineation options for the agricultural field. 8. The method of claim 7 , wherein each option, of the plurality of management zone delineation options, comprises zone layout digital data for an option, wherein the plurality of management delineation options is determined by: determining a plurality of count values for a management class count; for each count value, of the plurality of count values, generating a management zone delineation option by clustering, using a count value of the plurality of count values, the yield data and the field characteristics data, assigning zones to clusters, and including the management zone delineation option in the plurality of management zone delineation options. 9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising: using the instructions programmed in the computer system, receiving one or more selection criteria; and based on, at least in part, the one or more selection criteria, selecting one or more options from the plurality of management zone delineation options, and determining one or more planting plans for each of the one or more options. 10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising: using the instructions, and based upon the one or more options of the plurality of management zone delineation options and the one or more planting plans associated with the one or more options, causing driving one or more of: a seeding apparatus, an irrigation apparatus, an apparatus for application of fertilizers such as nitrogen, or a harvesting apparatus to perform, respectively, seeding, irrigation, application of fertilizers, and/or harvesting of the agricultural field according to an options from the one or more options. 11. A data processing system comprising a memory; one or more processors coupled to the memory and programmed to: determine two planting plans based on, at least in part, planting characteristics data received for an agricultural field and a plurality of management zone delineation options defined for the agricultural field; wherein each of the two planting plans specifies different planting recommendations for the agricultural field; generate and cause displaying, on a computing device, a first graphical representation
Design optimisation, verification or simulation (optimisation, verification or simulation of circuit designs G06F30/30) · CPC title
Following a specific plan, e.g. pattern · CPC title
Cultivation of specific crops or plants not otherwise provided for · CPC title
Precision agriculture · CPC title
Control of watering · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.