Collision mitigation and avoidance
US-9610945-B2 · Apr 4, 2017 · US
US10025319B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10025319-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615252389-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Aug 31, 2016 |
| Priority date | Aug 31, 2016 |
| Publication date | Jul 17, 2018 |
| Grant date | Jul 17, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A controller includes a processor and a memory storing processor-executable instructions in a host vehicle. The processor is programmed to designate a target vehicle as a collision risk upon determining that an intersection angle between the host vehicle and the target vehicle is between preset lower and upper bounds and an absolute value of an azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle is below a preset threshold.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A controller comprising a processor and a memory storing processor-executable instructions in a host vehicle such that the processor is programmed to: designate a target vehicle as a collision risk upon determining that an intersection angle between the host vehicle and the target vehicle is between preset lower and upper bounds and an absolute value of an azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle is below a preset threshold; and control a vehicle subsystem to evade the target vehicle if designated as a collision risk. 2. The controller of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further programmed to determine whether the target vehicle is within a preset range of the host vehicle. 3. The controller of claim 1 , wherein the preset lower bound is greater than zero degrees. 4. The controller of claim 3 , wherein the preset upper bound is less than 180 degrees. 5. The controller of claim 1 , wherein controlling the vehicle subsystem includes instructing brakes to brake. 6. The controller of claim 1 , wherein controlling the vehicle subsystem includes instructing a steering system to turn. 7. The controller of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further programmed to confirm the collision risk independently of the azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle. 8. The controller of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further programmed to instruct a vehicle subsystem to evade the target vehicle if designated as a collision risk and if the collision risk is confirmed independently of the azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle. 9. The controller of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further programmed to calculate a threat score based on the preset threshold and the azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle. 10. A method comprising: designating a target vehicle as a collision risk upon determining that an intersection angle between a host vehicle and the target vehicle is between preset lower and upper bounds and an absolute value of an azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle is below a preset threshold; and controlling, by a computer controller, a vehicle subsystem to evade the target vehicle if designated as a collision risk. 11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising determining whether the target vehicle is within a preset range of the host vehicle. 12. The method of claim 10 , wherein the preset lower bound is greater than zero degrees. 13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the preset upper bound is less than 180 degrees. 14. The method of claim 10 , wherein controlling the vehicle subsystem includes instructing brakes to brake. 15. The method of claim 10 , wherein controlling the vehicle subsystem includes instructing a steering system to turn. 16. The method of claim 10 , further comprising confirming the collision risk independently of the azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle. 17. The method of claim 10 , further comprising instructing a vehicle subsystem to evade the target vehicle if designated as a collision risk and if the collision risk is confirmed independently of the azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle. 18. The method of claim 10 , further comprising calculating a threat score based on the preset threshold and the azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle. 19. A controller comprising a processor and a memory storing processor-executable instructions in a host vehicle such that the processor is programmed to: designate a target vehicle as a collision risk upon determining that an intersection angle between the host vehicle and the target vehicle is between preset lower and upper bounds and an absolute value of an azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle is below a preset threshold; and instruct a vehicle subsystem to evade the target vehicle if designated as a collision risk and if the collision risk is confirmed independently of the azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle. 20. The controller of claim 19 , wherein instructing the vehicle subsystem includes at least one of instructing brakes to brake and instructing a steering system to turn.
Azimuth angle · CPC title
Input parameters relating to objects · CPC title
Spatial relation or speed relative to objects · CPC title
including control of steering systems · CPC title
Taking automatic action to avoid collision, e.g. braking and steering · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.