Core molding method and core molding device

US10016807B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-10016807-B2
Application numberUS-201415100798-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateNov 25, 2014
Priority dateDec 5, 2013
Publication dateJul 10, 2018
Grant dateJul 10, 2018

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

When a core die is being removed from a core while being rotated around its axis, the hardening time of self-hardening sand, the frictional forces generated between the core and the core die during die removal, and the strength of the core during die removal are optimized.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

The invention claimed is: 1. A core molding method for molding a core having a helical shape using a core die, the method comprising: a hardening step in which the core die is disposed in a frame and then self-hardening sand acquired by mixing sand, a resin, and a hardener is filled into the frame and left to harden; and a die removal step in which the core die is removed from the core, resulting from hardening of the self-hardening sand, while being rotated around an axis of the core die, wherein, in the die removal step, a time for hardening the self-hardening sand, a frictional force exerted between the core and the core die during die removal, and strength of the core during die removal are optimized wherein the core die is removed from the core while a moment M corresponding to torque and resulting from friction between the core and the core die during die removal is maintained so as to satisfy the following relationship: 0<M=kσπD 2 L/2≤T max , where k denotes a friction coefficient, D denotes a diameter of a cylinder having a contact area equivalent to a contact area over which the core die and the core touch each other, L denotes a length of the cylinder, σ denotes stress per unit area produced in the core, and T max denotes maximum torque produced during die removal when the core die is removable from the core. 2. The core molding method according to claim 1 , wherein the core die is removed from the core while stress σ per unit area produced in the core during die removal is maintained so as to satisfy the following relationship: 0<σ=2 hT max /πD 2 L≤σ min , where h denotes a coefficient, T max denotes maximum torque produced during die removal when the core die is removable from the core, D denotes a diameter of a cylinder having a contact area equivalent to a contact area over which the core die and the core touch each other, L denotes a length of the cylinder, and σ min denotes minimum compression strength of the core during die removal. 3. The core molding method according to claim 1 , wherein the core die is removed from the core while stress σ per unit area produced in the core during die removal is maintained so as to satisfy the following relationship: 0<σ=2 hT max /πD 2 L≤σ min , where h denotes a coefficient, T max denotes maximum torque produced during die removal when the core die is removable from the core, D denotes a diameter of a cylinder having a contact area equivalent to a contact area over which the core die and the core touch each other, L denotes a length of the cylinder, and σ min denotes minimum compression strength of the core during die removal. 4. The core molding method according to claim 1 , wherein the sand is new sand or reclaimed sand having polygonal or spherical grains, a size of which is 130 AFS or smaller. 5. The core molding method according to claim 1 , wherein the resin is an acid-setting furan resin containing furfuryl alcohol and a content of the resin with respect to the sand is 0.8%. 6. The core molding method according to claim 5 , wherein the hardener is a hardener acquired by mixing a xylene-sulfonic-acid-based hardener and a sulfuric-acid-based hardener and a content of the hardener with respect to the resin is 40%.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • by sweeping, turning, or coating · CPC title

  • with rotary templates, e.g. arranged on a pillar · CPC title

  • B22C9/10Primary

    Cores; Manufacture or installation of cores {(breaker cores B22C9/084)} · CPC title

  • Sand moulds or like moulds for shaped castings · CPC title

  • Core boxes · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US10016807B2 cover?
When a core die is being removed from a core while being rotated around its axis, the hardening time of self-hardening sand, the frictional forces generated between the core and the core die during die removal, and the strength of the core during die removal are optimized.
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Kobe Steel Ltd
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification B22C9/10. Mapped technology areas include Operations & Transport.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Jul 10 2018 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 1 related publication on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).