Differential throttling control enhancement
US-8998131-B1 · Apr 7, 2015 · US
US10005561B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10005561-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615184196-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jun 16, 2016 |
| Priority date | Jun 16, 2016 |
| Publication date | Jun 26, 2018 |
| Grant date | Jun 26, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Systems and methods for stabilizing an aircraft in response to a yaw movement are provided. In one embodiment, a method includes detecting a yaw movement of the aircraft. The yaw movement can cause a front portion of the aircraft to move towards a first side of the aircraft. The method can further include, in response to the yaw movement, initiating a trim process resulting in a thrust differential. The trim process can include increasing thrust in one or more engines on the first side of the aircraft and decreasing thrust in one or more engines on a second side of the aircraft. The method can include controlling the trim process based at least in part on a detected yaw movement of the aircraft.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. An aircraft comprising: one or more first engines located on a first side of the aircraft; one or more second engines located on a second side of the aircraft; a rudder; a computing system comprising one or more processors and one or more memory devices located on the aircraft, the one or more memory devices storing instructions that when executed by the one or more processors cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising: detecting a rudder deflection on a first side of the aircraft; and performing a trim process in response to the rudder deflection, the trim process comprising: determining an angle of the rudder; controlling one or more of the one or more first engines to increase thrust; controlling one or more of the one or more second engines to decrease thrust; and repeating the trim process when the angle of the rudder is not within a threshold amount of zero degrees. 2. A method for controlling an aircraft in response to a yaw movement comprising: detecting a yaw movement of the aircraft, the yaw movement causing a front portion of the aircraft to move towards a first side of the aircraft; in response to the yaw movement, initiating a trim process resulting in a thrust differential, the trim process comprising: increasing thrust in one or more engines on the first side of the aircraft; and decreasing thrust in one or more engines on a second side of the aircraft; and controlling the trim process based at least in part on a detected yaw movement of the aircraft, wherein controlling the trim process based at least in part on a detected yaw movement comprises: determining when the trim process negates the yaw movement; repeating the trim process when the trim process does not negate the yaw movement; and maintaining the thrust differential when the trim process negates the yaw movement, and wherein a drag on the aircraft during the trim process is generally consistent with or lower than a drag on the aircraft prior to the trim process. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein detecting the yaw movement of the aircraft comprises detecting that a rudder is deflected. 4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the determining when the trim process negates the yaw movement comprises determining when a rudder angle is within a threshold amount of zero degrees. 5. The method of claim 2 , wherein a rate of fuel consumption while the thrust differential is maintained is generally consistent with or lower than a rate of fuel consumption prior to the trim process. 6. The method of claim 2 , wherein the increase of thrust in the one or more engines on the first side of the aircraft is equal to the decrease of thrust in the one or more engines on the second side of the aircraft. 7. The method of claim 2 , wherein detecting the yaw movement of the aircraft comprises detecting that the aircraft has deviated from a flight plan by a threshold. 8. The method of claim 2 , wherein detecting the yaw movement of the aircraft comprises detecting non-responsiveness of one or more controls. 9. The method of claim 2 , wherein detecting the yaw movement of the aircraft comprises detecting a disruption in one or more of the one or more engines on the first side. 10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the disruption is in response to foreign object damage (FOD). 11. The method of claim 2 , wherein detecting the yaw movement of the aircraft comprises receiving first yaw movement data via one or more yaw movement sensors. 12. The method of claim 11 , wherein determining when the trim process negates the yaw movement comprises receiving second yaw movement data via the one or more yaw movement sensors. 13. A method for controlling an aircraft in response to a yaw movement comprising: detecting a yaw movement of the aircraft, the yaw movement causing a front portion of the aircraft to move towards a first side of the aircraft; in response to the yaw movement, initiating a trim process resulting in a thrust differential, the trim process comprising: increasing thrust in one or more engines on the first side of the aircraft; and decreasing thrust in one or more engines on a second side of the aircraft; and controlling the trim process based at least in part on a detected yaw movement of the aircraft, wherein controlling the trim process based at least in part on a detected yaw movement of the aircraft: detecting that a force causing the yaw movement has ceased to act on the aircraft; and ceasing to maintain the thrust differential in response to detecting that the force causing the yaw movement has ceased to act on the aircraft, and wherein a rate of fuel consumption after the thrust differential is ceased to be maintained is generally consistent with the rate of fuel consumption while the thrust differential is maintained. 14. The method of claim 13 , wherein a drag on the aircraft after the thrust differential is ceased to be maintained is generally consistent with a drag on the aircraft while the thrust differential is maintained.
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.